2022
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2022.2162173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory for movement rhythms given spatial relevance: Effects of sequence length and maintenance delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, based on our previous experience (e.g., Chiou, 2022aChiou, , 2022b, eight practice trials (with replay and feedback) should be sufficient for participants to understand and to perform the task properly. Moreover, in one of our previous studies (Chiou & Schack, 2023), participants performed a similar change-detection task under a dualprocessing condition for 288 trials (much more than the number of trials performed in the present study), but no learning effect was found across two experiments (N = 54 in total). The finding suggests that participants' sensitivity to spatial/temporal changes of the current stimulus set was relatively stable, and therefore the learning effect observed here should be attributed more to the development of a processing strategy than the increase of familiarity to the task.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Information Of Movements Were Not Autom...mentioning
confidence: 45%
“…However, based on our previous experience (e.g., Chiou, 2022aChiou, , 2022b, eight practice trials (with replay and feedback) should be sufficient for participants to understand and to perform the task properly. Moreover, in one of our previous studies (Chiou & Schack, 2023), participants performed a similar change-detection task under a dualprocessing condition for 288 trials (much more than the number of trials performed in the present study), but no learning effect was found across two experiments (N = 54 in total). The finding suggests that participants' sensitivity to spatial/temporal changes of the current stimulus set was relatively stable, and therefore the learning effect observed here should be attributed more to the development of a processing strategy than the increase of familiarity to the task.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Information Of Movements Were Not Autom...mentioning
confidence: 45%