Working memory representation in atypical language dominance

Abstract

One of the most important factors controlling material specific processing in the human brain is language dominance, i.e. hemispheric specialization in semantic processes. Although previous studies have shown that lateralized long-term memory processes in the medial temporal lobes are modified in subjects with atypical (right) language dominance, the effect of language dominance on the neural basis of working memory (WM) has remained unknown. Here, we used functional MRI (fMRI) to study the impact of language dominance on the neural representation of WM. We conducted an nback task in three different load conditions and with both verbal and nonverbal (spatial) material in matched groups of left and right language dominant subjects. This approach allowed us to investigate regions showing significant interactions between language dominance and material. Overall, right dominant subjects showed an increased inter-individual variability of WM-related activations. Verbal WM involved more pronounced activation of the left fusiform cortex in left dominant subjects and of the right inferior parietal lobule in the right dominant group. Spatial WM, on the other hand, induced activation of right hemispheric regions in left dominant subjects, but no specific activations in right dominant subjects. Taken together, these findings indicate that the neural basis of verbal WM processes depends on language dominance and is more mutable in right dominant subjects. The increased variability in right dominant subjects strongly suggests that a standard network of material-dependent WM processes exists in left dominant subjects, and that right dominant subjects use variable alternative networks. Hum Brain Mapp 30:2032Mapp 30: -2043Mapp 30: , 2009. V V C 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Quantifying cerebral asymmetries for language in dextrals and adextrals with random-effects meta analysis

“…It also provides an I 2 estimate describing variability due to subgroup differences that is not accounted for by sampling error. We have violated the assumption that the datasets are truly independent, as some participants from WADA tests were also scanned in parallel fMRI/MEG experiments (e.g., Spreer et al, 2002 ; Axmacher et al, 2009 ; Hirata et al, 2010 ). In this instance, the subgroup value of Chi 2 (2) = 6.69, p < 0.05.…”

Selective transfer of visual working memory training on Chinese character learning

“…These findings were taken to reflect the process of integrating shape elements into elaborated form descriptions in the left mid-fusiform gyrus for both visual objects and written words under task demands that emphasize visual processing like the orthographic task in the present experiment. Moreover, the left mid-fusiform gyrus was also found to be active in several visual working memory studies (Axmacher et al 2009;Buchsbaum et al 2005;Fiebach et al 2006;Schneiders et al 2011;Wager and Smith, 2003). It was argued that this involvement reflects visual analysis of objects held in working memory.…”

Comparison of fMRI paradigms assessing visuospatial processing: Robustness and reproducibility

“…In particular, developing precise models that capture which factors drive hemispheric specialization in individual subjects, how lateralization processes of different cognitive functions interact with each other, and how the brain integrates processes that are lateralized to opposite hemispheres. The relevance of such interactions among lateralized processes has been suggested for language and spatial attention [ 30 , 55 , 56 ], for language and working memory [ 57 ], and for face perception and handedness [ 17 ]. While moving in the right direction, these studies have not yet provided a principled and systematic investigation of the interactions among lateralized cognitive functions.…”