Working Politically: Combining Socio-Legal Tools to Study Experiences of Law

Abstract

This Article provides a novel insight into how earlycareer scholars in the UK may combine different theoretical tools in their research, and the implications that this may have for the socio-legal discipline. This Article draws upon the author’s experience of combining theoretical tools from different schools of thought: Feminist legal theory, Bourdieusian theory, and Actor Network Theory, within the context of recent research into experiences of those representing themselves in family court hearings in England and Wales. Combining these theories for the first time, this Article explores the difficulties, tensions, and benefits of combining tools within socio-legal research and reflects upon the influence of the pedagogical and institutional resources that characterize the socio-legal research environment in the UK. This Article argues that the task of combining different tools provides scholars with the opportunity to work politically, because the process of reconciling tensions between different approaches requires researchers to reflect upon the worldviews that underpin their selected theories. In this sense, it argues that combining different theories within socio-legal research is a political activity, because researchers are required to reflect not only on how theoretical choices may contest, expand, or develop dominant assumptions that characterize socio-legal scholarly traditions.

Cyber blame and social theory

“…This connects to philosophy that allows for both individual and group blaming (Royakkers and Hughes 2020 ). Legal person also connects my ideas to thinking about intersectionality as initiated by Crenshaw ( 1989 ) and under debate in recent legal studies that portray multi-dimensional social identities (Mant 2020 ; La Barbera and Lopez 2019 ). A fluid model of blame that works cybernetically in an infinite number of levels might offer ideas about simultaneous multiplicity.…”

“From the lease’s point of view”: the role of tied leases in shaping the UK pub sector

“…As Hunter’s argument is rooted firmly in “actor network theory” (ANT), it important to highlight two key features of this literature. First, as Mant argues, “actor-network theory ” is perhaps a deceptive phrase, as it is best understood as an “analytical method” rather than an explanatory theory (Mant, 2020). As Cowan and Carr warn, there is “considerable naval gazing” over the meaning of the term, which is no doubt “frustrating to some” (Cowan and Carr, 2008).…”