Working Side by Side? Interaction and Interview Data in Research on Household Conflicts

Abstract

The article discusses the possibilities and challenges of combining conversation analysis and ethnography in the study of everyday family life. We argue that such a combination requires the decision whether to prioritise interaction data or ethnographic (in particular, interview) data in the analysis. We present a conversation analytic case study of how household work is commonly brought up in the interactions of one couple and bring this to bear on a re-analysis of a possible conflict situation originally described in the ethnographic analysis by Klein, Izquierdo, and Bradbury (2007), published in this journal. While the findings of the two analyses converge, they inform us about different dimensions of couple interaction. The ethnographic analysis is focused on participants' experiences, and the conversation analysis is focused on participants' practices. We conclude that the methodological decision to prioritise interaction or interview data has consequences for the kind of questions we can ask.

Collaborative Relationships Among Couples: Frames of Interaction During Everyday Household Activities

“…As this is an awkward situation for the child, one way to deal with it is to disown the fault. These elements are interesting in terms of ethnographic and discursive approaches (Zinken & Borek, 2012) because participants' experiences and practices can be highlighted according to the perspective that the researcher is taking.…”