2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1755773916000114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working through the issues: how issue diversity and ideological disagreement influence coalition duration

Abstract: Issue salience and diversity direct a range of outcomes such as voting behavior and public policy. Studies, however, have yet to fully integrate theoretical or empirical expectations for the effect of issue salience on coalition stability. By focusing on the mechanism linking parties' preferences to policy-making, I propose that parties with more diverse platforms provide coalitions greater room to negotiate, whereas parties focusing on a small number of issues exacerbate ideological tensions. Issue diversity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Issue diversity likely matters for a range of political outcomes (e.g. Jennings et al 2011;Boydstun et al 2014;Greene 2016b). Incorporating research on issue diversity provides a means of characterizing political campaigns that may result in new approaches to the study of elections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issue diversity likely matters for a range of political outcomes (e.g. Jennings et al 2011;Boydstun et al 2014;Greene 2016b). Incorporating research on issue diversity provides a means of characterizing political campaigns that may result in new approaches to the study of elections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Party family membership may serve as a proxy for the underlying cleavage structure of a niche, as party families tend to group together parties that mobilized in similar historical circumstances and had the intention of representing similar interests' (Gallagher et al, 1995: 181). Third, on the basis of the CMP, we again constructed an inverse Herfindahl measure that captures the density of the issue agenda within each niche (for more details on the exact calculation, see Greene, 2014). Theoretically, the resulting measure equals 1 if all parties competing in an election only emphasize one single issue -producing maximum concentration -whereas increasing values denote more issue agenda density.…”
Section: Operationalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warwick (1994) argues that disagreement causes coalitions to terminate prematurely as they are incapable of developing legislation. Indeed, this relationship holds strongest empirically accounting for issue diversity in parties’ platforms (Greene, 2016).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%