2013
DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2012.712544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working time flexibility components and working time regimes in Europe: using company-level data across 21 countries

Abstract: Working time flexibility comprises a wide variety of arrangements, from part-time, overtime, to long-term leaves. Theoretical approaches to grouping these arrangements have been developed, but empirical underpinnings are rare. This paper investigates the bundles that can be found for various flexible working time arrangements, using data of the Establishment Survey on Working Time (ESWT), 2004/2005, covering 21 EU member states and 13 industries. Using factor analyses, the results confirmed that working time a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
78
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The strain of working caregivers may be lower than in other countries because a wide range of supports are available to and affordable for overwhelmed caregivers; the most care-intensive recipients are usually taken care of by the state; and due to more worker-friendly conditions (Chung and Tijdens 2013;Gallie 2003). The results should nonetheless be of interest to researchers and decision makers in this field because they may shed light on the moderating role of different welfare and long-term care regimes on the psychological effects of caregiving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strain of working caregivers may be lower than in other countries because a wide range of supports are available to and affordable for overwhelmed caregivers; the most care-intensive recipients are usually taken care of by the state; and due to more worker-friendly conditions (Chung and Tijdens 2013;Gallie 2003). The results should nonetheless be of interest to researchers and decision makers in this field because they may shed light on the moderating role of different welfare and long-term care regimes on the psychological effects of caregiving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal care attention (e.g., help with dressing, bathing, and eating) are usually the responsibility of the public services in Norway. In addition, employee rights are more generous in Norway than in most other countries (Chung and Tijdens 2013), which may make it less burdensome to combine work and care. Even though there are no special arrangements to facilitate workers in their caring for a frail partner or parent, employee rights and arrangements that apply to all employees can make it easier to manage such a squeeze (Gautun and Hagen 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also large differences in the institutional contexts and employment regimes in Europe (Esping-Andersen, 1990;Hall and Soskice, 2001), more specifically in relation to family policy configurations (Korpi et al, 2013). The variance also exist in relation to working time regimes, i.e., the extent to which countries differ in the working hours patterns observed for men and women across different life stages (Anxo et al, 2007), in their use of employer vs employee-oriented working time flexibility (Chung and Tijdens, 2013), the flexibility in the number of hours worked as well as the gender discrepancy (Figart and Mutari, 2000). Furthermore, there are differences across countries in the extent to which working time and work-life balance arrangements are discussed in collective agreements (Eurofound, 2017).…”
Section: Variance Across Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study of Chung & Tijdens (2013) classified twenty one European country according to its use of flexible working-time arrangements in three groups: The first group is South Europe with Hungary and Slovenia where employees and organizations do not use flexible working-time arrangements. The second group consists of Northern Europe with Greece and Poland; where employees and organizations are intensively using flexible working-time arrangements.…”
Section: International Journal Of Human Resource Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%