2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2018.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working Toward a Genomic Prognostic Classification of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…9 The frequency of CXCR4 MUT patients in our trial was higher than previously described (56%), likely as a result of the sensitivity of the deep NGS strategy and digital PCR, as well as the relapse setting. 34,35 We did not find any difference in time to response, quality of response, or PFS according to CXCR4 mutation profile or type of mutation (frameshift [FS] vs nonsense [NS]), in contrast to previously described patients treated with ibrutinib. 35 TP53 mutations were observed in 24% of the patients in our R/R cohort, which is also higher than previously described at diagnosis.…”
Section: Inclusion N=50contrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 The frequency of CXCR4 MUT patients in our trial was higher than previously described (56%), likely as a result of the sensitivity of the deep NGS strategy and digital PCR, as well as the relapse setting. 34,35 We did not find any difference in time to response, quality of response, or PFS according to CXCR4 mutation profile or type of mutation (frameshift [FS] vs nonsense [NS]), in contrast to previously described patients treated with ibrutinib. 35 TP53 mutations were observed in 24% of the patients in our R/R cohort, which is also higher than previously described at diagnosis.…”
Section: Inclusion N=50contrasting
confidence: 59%
“…34,35 We did not find any difference in time to response, quality of response, or PFS according to CXCR4 mutation profile or type of mutation (frameshift [FS] vs nonsense [NS]), in contrast to previously described patients treated with ibrutinib. 35 TP53 mutations were observed in 24% of the patients in our R/R cohort, which is also higher than previously described at diagnosis. 21,36 Only AEs with rates $ 5% are reported.…”
Section: Inclusion N=50contrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Genes of canonical and noncanonical NF-κB pathways, CXCR4, Toll-like receptors (TLR), and B cell receptor (BCR) may be activated deregulation of survival, apoptosis and proliferation, which may lead to WM clone expansion and tumor progression. Reprinted from Magierowicz et al [8], with permission from Elsevier in this latest report (1.8 versus 2.9 years without reaching statistical significance). In summary, more prospective studies are needed to conclude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Preclinical studies with the most common CXCR4 S338X mutation in WM have shown sustained signaling of AKT, ERK, and BTK following CXCL12 binding in comparison with wildtype CXCR4, as well as increased cell growth and survival of WM cells. CXCR4 mutations are associated with complex genomic aberrations [8,32]. Patients with CXCR4 mutations demonstrate lower adenopathies, delineating differences in disease tropism, and nonsense mutations are associated with higher IgM production and hyperviscosity [12].…”
Section: Cxcr4 Mutation: a Prognostic Factor?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been associated with prognosis in some studies [85] but not confirmed in others [123], and it has been considered as predictive for response to ibrutinib [157,158]. However, additional follow up is needed to confirm the prognostic impact, especially in non-ibrutinib-treated patients [159].…”
Section: Cxcr4 Whim-like Mutations In Lpl/wmmentioning
confidence: 99%