2016
DOI: 10.1108/jmhtep-01-2016-0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working towards co-production in rehabilitation and recovery services

Abstract: Working towards Co-production in Rehabilitation and Recovery Services.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the most effective approach may be for services to enact a coproduction agenda with both service users and carers (Freeman et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the most effective approach may be for services to enact a coproduction agenda with both service users and carers (Freeman et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Implementing the 'Triangle of Care' (Worthington et al 2013) across services would also support this ambition as would creating specialist roles or link workers within services to lead this work. However, the most effective approach may be for services to enact a coproduction agenda with both service users and carers (Freeman et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although focus group 3 (predominantly made up of RMN) noted specific tools used for this, the absence of any discussion of these in the other groups may indicate that such approaches are not embedded widely within the team or are only employed by registered staff. Promoting such tools could provide practical ways to support co‐produced/ person‐centred care (Epstein, Fiscella, Lesser & Stange, ; Freeman et al, ) to aid therapeutic engagement. Although not a specific question on the topic guide, the discussion of ‘team‐level formulations’ (Johnstone, ) in groups 1 and 2 suggested deciphering patterns in behaviour to be important for developing staff knowledge and understanding of individual service users (McAllister et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%