Abstract:The results of this exploratory research provide a beginning formulation of a gender‐sensitive approach to working with men in family therapy. A panel of 36 family therapists endorsed 131 interventions as appropriate and effective ways to work with men. The results suggest the importance of therapist awareness of gender issues and socialization in working with male clients. Interventions were highly endorsed in the areas of developing therapist perceptual and conceptual skills regarding gender, promoting mutua… Show more
“…General results of the study indicate sufficient consensus between the female and male therapists to endorse 131 (or 38.6%) of the total 339 items in the second round of the Delphi Questionnaire (DQII). (These results are published elsewhere: see Dienhart and Avis, 1994. ) Of the remaining items, a gender-based sub-analysis revealed that male therapists endorsed an additional twenty-seven items as appropriate and potentially effective, while female therapists endorsed an additional thirteen items.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Male and female participants agreed on 36% of the interventions suggested for challenging stereotypical attitudes and behaviours (see Dienhart and Avis, 1994). In this area, the male panelists again endorsed more additional items than the female panelists (six compared to two).…”
Section: Challenging Stereotypical Attitudes and Behavioursmentioning
The results of this exploratory Delphi study provide a beginning formulation of a gender-sensitive approach to working with men in the specialized field of couple and family therapy. The research specifically investigated what a panel of thirty-six 'expert' family therapists believed would be appropriate and effective techniques to engage men in therapy and in the process of family change. This report focuses on findings highlighting differences between what female and male therapists preferred as techniques to work with men in family therapy.
“…General results of the study indicate sufficient consensus between the female and male therapists to endorse 131 (or 38.6%) of the total 339 items in the second round of the Delphi Questionnaire (DQII). (These results are published elsewhere: see Dienhart and Avis, 1994. ) Of the remaining items, a gender-based sub-analysis revealed that male therapists endorsed an additional twenty-seven items as appropriate and potentially effective, while female therapists endorsed an additional thirteen items.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Male and female participants agreed on 36% of the interventions suggested for challenging stereotypical attitudes and behaviours (see Dienhart and Avis, 1994). In this area, the male panelists again endorsed more additional items than the female panelists (six compared to two).…”
Section: Challenging Stereotypical Attitudes and Behavioursmentioning
The results of this exploratory Delphi study provide a beginning formulation of a gender-sensitive approach to working with men in the specialized field of couple and family therapy. The research specifically investigated what a panel of thirty-six 'expert' family therapists believed would be appropriate and effective techniques to engage men in therapy and in the process of family change. This report focuses on findings highlighting differences between what female and male therapists preferred as techniques to work with men in family therapy.
“…Aloof, controlling, and aggressive male behavior is recognized in the literature as exaggerated negative aspects of machismo (Torres, Solberg, & Carlstrom 2002). Restrictive or deleterious male roles have been recognized throughout most cultures, and Dienhart and Avis (1994) asserted that therapists must be aware of their beliefs regarding the male role and their potentially harmful affects upon clientele. They suggested that professionals with such perceptions subtly enforced a limited range of male affect and behaviors in intimate relationships.…”
This article features the implementation and outcome of an experiential activity addressing gender bias in students at three university-based Guatemalan counselor education programs. The authors present students' thematic responses delineating expectations of gender-specific communication styles and roles. A sequence of activities and students' reflective commentaries are included, with suggestions for counselor educators in addressing gender bias in student populations.
“…Ot K er studies in t a e field of MFT have used this approach to obtain the consensus of experts about a particular issue (e.g., Avis, 1986;Dienhart & Avis, 1994;Fish & Piercy, 1987;Jenkins, 1996; Winkle, Piercy, & Hovestadt, 1981).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.