2014
DOI: 10.1080/10428232.2014.939938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working With Parents of Gender-Variant Children: Using Social Action as an Emancipatory Research Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the spirit of collaborative action research and its focus on empowering and not simply studying participants, no formal demographic information was collected as we wanted to keep formal data gathering (i.e., completion of forms and questionnaires) to a minimum. Formalized means of gathering data may exacerbate unequal power hierarchies among participants and researchers, which does not fit within the epistemological parameters of social action methodology (Fleming and Ward, 2004;Sansfaçon, Ward, Robichaud, Dumais-Michaud, & Clegg, 2014). Indeed, it is believed that participants should own and be responsible for keeping a record: "It is more in keeping with the self-directed approach if either the workers maintain a record but share it with group members, in a way that makes it the property of the whole group, or if group members themselves act in this capacity" (Mullender & Ward, 1991, p. 76).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the spirit of collaborative action research and its focus on empowering and not simply studying participants, no formal demographic information was collected as we wanted to keep formal data gathering (i.e., completion of forms and questionnaires) to a minimum. Formalized means of gathering data may exacerbate unequal power hierarchies among participants and researchers, which does not fit within the epistemological parameters of social action methodology (Fleming and Ward, 2004;Sansfaçon, Ward, Robichaud, Dumais-Michaud, & Clegg, 2014). Indeed, it is believed that participants should own and be responsible for keeping a record: "It is more in keeping with the self-directed approach if either the workers maintain a record but share it with group members, in a way that makes it the property of the whole group, or if group members themselves act in this capacity" (Mullender & Ward, 1991, p. 76).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender variance (GV) is the most common term used in literature to refer to an individual's atypical growth in a binary and normalized system. This term is grounded in the medical realm (Pullen Sansfaçon, Ward, Robichaud, Dumais‐Michaud, & Clegg, 2014; Pullen Sansfaçon, Robichaud, & Dumais‐Michaud, 2015), and for this reason, more kaleidoscopic and fluid terms have started to become widespread in the literature on childhood gender issues including gender creative, gender expansive (Ehrensaft, 2016), gender diverse (Nealy, 2017), gender explorers, and gender bosses (Roche, 2020). These terms have been proposed both by GV supportive clinicians (Ehrensaft, 2016) and parents (Pullen Sansfaçon et al, 2015) to make it clear that gender variance is not a mental illness but one of the possibilities of gender expression (American Psychological Association [APA], 2015; Coleman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CBPR approach intentionally takes power differences into account in partnering with communities to answer a research question or to conduct a research project with tangible outcomes for the community. CBPR may be especially useful for research involving marginalized communities, such as TGN youth and their families (Clements-Nolle & Bachrach, 2003;Pullen Sansfac¸on et al, 2014;Travers et al, 2013), because this approach seeks to identify and address the source of marginalization (Israel, Schultz, Parker, & Becker, 1998). CBPR seeks to ensure the relevance of the research for the community.…”
Section: Why Cbpr?mentioning
confidence: 99%