2019
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1630769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workload control and optimised order release: an assessment by simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), where each experimental scenario was replicated 100 times. These simulation conditions are in line with those used in previous studies that applied simulation e.g., [31], allowing to obtain stable results, while keeping the simulation run time to a reasonable level. Moreover, to validate our model we compared simulation and meta-heuristic results under deterministic times.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…), where each experimental scenario was replicated 100 times. These simulation conditions are in line with those used in previous studies that applied simulation e.g., [31], allowing to obtain stable results, while keeping the simulation run time to a reasonable level. Moreover, to validate our model we compared simulation and meta-heuristic results under deterministic times.…”
Section: Simulation Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Controlled release decision focuses on unreleased jobs, which includes the remaining jobs at last decision point and new arriving jobs. An integer linear programming (ILP) model of release decision is presented by [37] in job shop, and jobs are released as long as they will not violate the upper bound of resources within their selected process routes. We extend this ILP model in DFAJS, routing decision is incorporated into release decision.…”
Section: Sets and Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lean paradigm, the elimination of non-value-added activities and wastes, such as overproduction and buffer, aims to reduce lead time, guaranteeing more responsiveness to customer demand (Haider and Mirza 2015). Other causes of waste are represented by long waiting and queue times that may occur due to the over-saturation of resources (Haider and Mirza 2015) or unbalanced scheduling plan (Fernandes et al, 2014;Fernandes et al, 2020), resulting in large work in process (WIP). The identification and monitoring of an appropriate set of indicators represents a key aspect especially within dynamic contexts, where changes in key performance indicators (KPIs) have to be immediately followed by the most appropriate reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%