1995
DOI: 10.1080/1047322x.1995.10387655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workplace Emission Factors for Hexavalent Chromium Plating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…G D C room;avg Q exh C sup;avg Q sup C inf;avg Q inf [6] RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Table I presents the TWA concentrations measured at the center of the room each sampling day as well as the range and average concentration of all the area measurements that day. These results demonstrate that the concentrations in the room were reasonably uniform.…”
Section: Emission Rate Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G D C room;avg Q exh C sup;avg Q sup C inf;avg Q inf [6] RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Table I presents the TWA concentrations measured at the center of the room each sampling day as well as the range and average concentration of all the area measurements that day. These results demonstrate that the concentrations in the room were reasonably uniform.…”
Section: Emission Rate Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hourly chromium emissions determined in a previous study (13) are compared in Figure 9 with allocated piston line concentrations at sample location B. There is a positive association between emissions and CMB estimates.…”
Section: Chromium Contributions and Room Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Shop 1 was a room with a single copper electroplating line;('') shop 2 was a large bay containing a chromium conversion coating line, a continuous chromium electroplating line, and several manual electroplating operations; (12) and shop 3 contained a piston chrome plating line, a decorative chrome plating line, and manual and barrel zinc coating lines. (13) For each shop, two or three sources were selected for applying the CMB model. The chemical composition of workroom emissions (i.e., source fingerprint) was determined for each source on an hourly basis, and for one shop, also on a 6-hour basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) Models can also incorporate emission factors to describe source emission rates that vary due to process rate changes. (7)(8)(9)(10)(11) …”
Section: Generation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Integrating Equation 9 over two radial distances gives the average concentration between those distances. [10] Equation 10 cannot be used to determine the average concentration from the source at r = 0 to a distance because ln (0) is unde ned. For this example scenario, the average concentration over a 1-meter distance from r = 0.05 to 1.05 meters was calculated using values of D as 0.1, 0.3, and 0.6 m 2 /min.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%