2009
DOI: 10.3747/co.v16i5.381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workplace Support for Employees with Cancer

Abstract: ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to survey human resources personnel about how their northeastern Ontario workplaces assist employees with cancer.Study Design and Setting This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2007 to April 2008. Surveys were sent to 255 workplaces in northeastern Ontario with 25 or more employees, and 101 workplaces responded (39.6% response rate). Logistic regression modelling was used to identify factors associated with more or less workplace support. More or less w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of the work environment influencing work outcomes would be an agreement between employee and employer over a change in duties or hours [40]. Another example of the involvement of the work environment is providing high levels of tangible workplace support (i.e., paid time for medical appointments, an offer of a return to work meeting, and reduced hours) for employees with cancer [41]. This can assist in the return to work transition.…”
Section: Work Environmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An example of the work environment influencing work outcomes would be an agreement between employee and employer over a change in duties or hours [40]. Another example of the involvement of the work environment is providing high levels of tangible workplace support (i.e., paid time for medical appointments, an offer of a return to work meeting, and reduced hours) for employees with cancer [41]. This can assist in the return to work transition.…”
Section: Work Environmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cancer survivors RTW because of the financial and psycho-social benefits that working holds for them (Messner & Vera, 2011;Steiner, Cavender, Main & Bradley, 2004;Stergiou-Kita et al, 2016). For the cancer survivor, working provides independence and purpose (Messner & Vera, 2011); it restores normality, routine, stability and social control (Clarke, 2015;Kennedy et al, 2007;Nowrouzi, Lightfoot, Cote & Watson, 2009); it enhances their sense of self-worth, identity and social connectedness; and it boosts their emotional well-being and self-esteem (Knott et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowrouzi et al (2009, 18-20) described in their article the numerous barriers that may block the process of RTW or maintaining a job inside the organizations while dealing with a cancer illness throughout this time. Among these, the authors mention (Nowrouzi et al 2009): the incorrect perception of managers and also co-workers, in some cases, that employees diagnosed with cancer possess more significant limitations at work, than they do in reality; the incorrect perception that patients with cancer cannot manage their job duties simultaneously with illness management; the misperception that this category of subject can work harder than in reality. In this direction a study of Mak et al (2014, 272) sustained the idea that patients who RTW focus on achieving normality at work, a topic described also by Amir et al (2010).…”
Section: General Debate Upon Variables Cancer and Rtwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an article Tiedtke et al (2013, 399-409) (Nowrouzi et al 2009;Grunfeld, Low and Cooper 2010;Tiedtke et al 2013). …”
Section: General Debate Upon Variables Cancer and Rtwmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation