Workplace Well-Being Factors That Predict Employee Participation, Health and Medical Cost Impact, and Perceived Support

Abstract

Purpose: This study tested relationships between health and well-being best practices and 3 types of outcomes. Design: A cross-sectional design used data from the HERO Scorecard Benchmark Database. Setting: Data were voluntarily provided by employers who submitted web-based survey responses. Sample: Analyses were limited to 812 organizations that completed the HERO Scorecard between January 12, 2015 and October 2, 2017. Measures: Independent variables included organizational and leadership support, program comprehensiveness, program integration, and incentives. Dependent variables included participation rates, health and medical cost impact, and perceptions of organizational support. Analysis: Three structural equation models were developed to investigate the relationships among study variables. Results: Model sample size varied based on organizationally reported outcomes. All models fit the data well (comparative fit index > 0.96). Organizational and leadership support was the strongest predictor ( P < .05) of participation (n = 276 organizations), impact (n = 160 organizations), and perceived organizational support (n = 143 organizations). Incentives predicted participation in health assessment and biometric screening ( P < .05). Program comprehensiveness and program integration were not significant predictors ( P > .05) in any of the models. Conclusion: Organizational and leadership support practices are essential to produce participation, health and medical cost impact, and perceptions of organizational support. While incentives influence participation, they are likely insufficient to yield downstream outcomes. The overall study design limits the ability to make causal inferences from the data.

Health ambassadors in the workplace: a health promotion intervention mobilizing middle managers and RE-AIM evaluation of outcomes

“…This study suggests that upper management support was integral to successful implementation of HP programming, and the sites without management support were unable to proceed. These findings correspond with a study evaluating best practices in workplace health promotion that reviewed wellness programs in 812 organizations, and identified organizational and leadership support practices as essential factors to participation as well as health and medical cost impact [ 43 ]. Similarly, a recent study found that workers are more likely to both participate in WHP and engage in recommended health behaviors when they feel that their employers care about their health [ 44 ].…”

Development, Success Factors, and Challenges of Government-Led Health and Productivity Management Initiatives in Japan

“… 25 These items were divided into nine categories: leadership, relevance, partnership, comprehensiveness, implementation, engagement, communication, data driven, and compliance. A previous study 26 used HERO scorecard data to examine factors in health promotion programs affecting participation in health assessments and biometric screening, the impact on medical costs, and perceptions of organizational and leadership support. That study found that organizational and leadership support was the strongest predictor of success in these areas.…”

The “Best of 2020 List” of Health Promotion Researchers

“…Jessica Grossmeier, PhD, MPH, Patricia H. Castle, PhD, Jennifer S. Pitts, PhD, Colleen Saringer, PhD, Kristi Rahrig Jenkins, PhD, Mary T. Imboden, PhD, David J. Mangen, PhD, Sara S. Johnson, PhD, Steven P. Noeldner, PhD, MS, Shawn T. Mason, PhD, LP. 7…”