2007
DOI: 10.1109/fie.2007.4418236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workshop - streamlining the assessment process with the faculty course assessment report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tables III-IX are as follows: Q1 is quiz 1, HW1 is homework 1, LR1 is lab report 1, q1 is question 1, LM is midterm lab exam, LF is final lab exam, and P is project work. In Tables III-XII, the EAMU is a performance vector with the following four categories [3], [9]: E is for exemplary with a point value of 3, A is for adequate with a point value of 2, M is for minimal with a point value of 1, and U is for unsatisfactory with a point value of 0. We have set a uniform metric goal of 2 for all the course learning outcomes of the EEET 209 course.…”
Section: Clo's Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tables III-IX are as follows: Q1 is quiz 1, HW1 is homework 1, LR1 is lab report 1, q1 is question 1, LM is midterm lab exam, LF is final lab exam, and P is project work. In Tables III-XII, the EAMU is a performance vector with the following four categories [3], [9]: E is for exemplary with a point value of 3, A is for adequate with a point value of 2, M is for minimal with a point value of 1, and U is for unsatisfactory with a point value of 0. We have set a uniform metric goal of 2 for all the course learning outcomes of the EEET 209 course.…”
Section: Clo's Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the FCAR serves as an effective documentation tool for the purpose of both course learning outcomes (CLO) and student outcomes (SO) assessment [1]. Course data collection and FCAR documentation is done by the respective course instructors because they are the ones who are closest to the data [1]- [3]. This paper discusses how FCAR was adopted as an effective tool for the assessment of both course learning outcomes and student outcomes in microcontroller applications [4] course for the purpose of successful accreditation [5] of electrical and electronics engineering technology (EEET) program at Hafr Al-Batin community college (HBCC) by the engineering technology accreditation commission (ETAC) [6] of ABET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure is applied to the four outcomes and on every student in the course to develop an EAMU vector for each ILOs. The EAMU model was proposed in [5] and has been used in a previous research study [6] that compared the achievements of ILOs in face-to-face and online classes. For example, in a C++ online offering of the course in spring 2011 the computed EAMU vector for the first outcome (O1) is [7, 1, 1, 0] meaning that out of the 9 students who passed the course, 7 exhibited exemplary attainment of outcome 1, 1 at the adequate level, one minimal and zero unsatisfactory.…”
Section: Comparing Achievment Of Course Learning Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of ABET -Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology-accreditation requirements, our department continues, after being accredited, the assessment of its courses. Therefore, a model called EAMU proposed in [5] was adopted by our department in its assessment procedure and is also adopted in this research in order to quantify students' achievement of the ILOs. In our experiments, the above-mentioned four course ILOs were measured by computing the EAMU vector for each outcome.…”
Section: Put Into Practice Effective Use Of An Integrated Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%