2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of parasiticides for the treatment, prevention and control of flea and tick infestation on dogs and cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The three groups each consisted of three males and five female cats and thus with 8 animals per group exceeded the requirements of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P. ), "Guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of parasiticides for the treatment, prevention and control of flea and tick infestations on dogs and cats" of at least six animals per group (Marchiondo et al 2013). All cats were dewormed and did not harbour ticks or fleas at the commencement of the study.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three groups each consisted of three males and five female cats and thus with 8 animals per group exceeded the requirements of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P. ), "Guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of parasiticides for the treatment, prevention and control of flea and tick infestations on dogs and cats" of at least six animals per group (Marchiondo et al 2013). All cats were dewormed and did not harbour ticks or fleas at the commencement of the study.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Live free or attached ticks were considered treatment failures (Marchiondo et al 2013). The primary assessment norm was the number of ticks counted on the untreated control and the two treated groups of cats at the various assessment times and days, with efficacy calculations based on arithmetic means.…”
Section: Tick Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The days of 'flea powder' as the mainstay of ectoparasite control are long past, and dog owners have a wide variety of insecticidal and acaricidal sprays, 'spot-ons', dips, rinses and shampoos, orally administered tablets, and chemically-impregnated collars to choose from. Such products contain not only pulicides and acaricides, some also contain insect growth regulators (IGRs), or insect development inhibitors (IDIs) that exert their action by interfering with the development of the eggs or other off-host life-cycle stages, and some have repellent agents (e.g., permethrin) that discourage arthropods from attaching to the host [76].…”
Section: Paradigm 5: Prevention Is Better Than Curementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ticks were counted in situ and classified, but left in place at the 24 h and 48 h post infestation tick counts and removed at the 72 h count. The ticks remaining on the placebo dogs 72 h post infestation on Days 98, 112 and 196 were not removed until the following tick challenge, to re-stimulate these dogs' Marchiondo et al (2007) immunity to holocyclotoxin. Acaricidal efficacy was calculated using geometric mean numbers of ticks, as recommended by Marchiondo et al (2007):…”
Section: Assessing Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%