2017
DOI: 10.26451/abc.04.03.03.2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

World in Motion: Perception and Discrimination of Movement in Juvenile Grey Bamboo Sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(101 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The individuals’ experience with single objects possibly gained during previous experiments ( cf . Fuss et al. 2017 ; Schluessel et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The individuals’ experience with single objects possibly gained during previous experiments ( cf . Fuss et al. 2017 ; Schluessel et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As all individuals had already participated in previous experiments on different visual discrimination tasks (i.e., bamboo sharks: Fuss et al. 2017 , Malawi cichlids: Schluessel et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several elasmobranch species, including the grey bamboo shark ( Chiloscyllium griseum ) and the ocellate river stingray ( Potamotrygon motoro ), have been part of a range of cognition experiments and have shown various visual discrimination as well as orientation abilities (see reviews [ 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]). Adding to that, freshwater stingrays ( Potamotrygon castexi ) are able to use water as a tool to extract food from a tube [ 54 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By training animals, opposed to testing for spontaneous choice, one can control all variables potentially influencing the animal’s choice [ 34 ]. In previous studies, grey bamboo sharks were able to distinguish between symmetrical and non-symmetrical shapes, various stationary objects (including geometric forms) as well as moving stimuli and categorized two-dimensional objects [ 49 , 52 , 57 ]. They also performed well in a range of optical illusion experiments [ 50 , 58 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%