2001
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200109070-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

World-wide variation in HIV-1 phenotypic susceptibility in untreated individuals: biologically relevant values for resistance testing

Abstract: Phenotypic drug susceptibility of HIV-1 in untreated individuals varies markedly from drug to drug, with broadly similar patterns world-wide. These results have important implications in defining the 'normal range' of phenotypic susceptibility to antiretroviral agents and establish biologically relevant cut-off values for this phenotypic drug susceptibility test.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although plateaus in the PhenoSense HIV Entry assay were generally higher than those observed in PBL assays, the rank order of plateau heights was the same in both assay systems. Quantitative differences between phenotypic assays are commonly seen with other classes of antiretrovirals, leading to variation in biologically and clinically relevant cutoffs (in IC 50 ) assigned to individual drugs in different resistance tests (10,21,24). Differences in the way in which assays are configured (such as a single round versus multiple rounds of infection and the multiplicity of infection and endpoint used) and intrinsic target cell differences (such as surface receptor density) all contribute to variations in cutoffs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although plateaus in the PhenoSense HIV Entry assay were generally higher than those observed in PBL assays, the rank order of plateau heights was the same in both assay systems. Quantitative differences between phenotypic assays are commonly seen with other classes of antiretrovirals, leading to variation in biologically and clinically relevant cutoffs (in IC 50 ) assigned to individual drugs in different resistance tests (10,21,24). Differences in the way in which assays are configured (such as a single round versus multiple rounds of infection and the multiplicity of infection and endpoint used) and intrinsic target cell differences (such as surface receptor density) all contribute to variations in cutoffs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several variables that affect the potency of these agents, including the impressive genetic variability of Env (15). In general, the potencies with which entry inhibitors fully suppress infection of primary virus strains vary to a greater extent than do those of antiviral agents that target more conserved viral proteins, such as reverse transcriptase, integrase, and protease (20,31). In addition, host cell factors also influence the efficiencies with which entry inhibitors prevent virus infection of primary cells obtained from different individuals (27,35,37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of drug resistance have mainly focused on HIV-1 subtype B, which is dominant in developed countries (26). A paucity of data on the emergence of antiretroviral (ARV) drug resistance in individuals or populations infected with other subtypes (e.g., A, C, D, and CRF01) likely is attributable to limited access to ARV drug treatment in developing countries (1, 2, 13, 15, 30-32, 39, 47, 53).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%