2011
DOI: 10.1086/662027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Worlds Otherwise”

Abstract: The debate concerning ontology is heating up in the social sciences. How is this impacting anthropology and archaeology? What contributions can these disciplines make? Following a session at the 2010 Theoretical Archaeology Group conference at Brown University ("'Worlds Otherwise': Archaeology, Theory, and Ontological Difference," convened by Ben Alberti and Yvonne Marshall), a group of archaeologists and anthropologists have continued to discuss the merits, possibilities, and problems of an ontologically orie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The chapters in this volume address different dimensions and implications of ritual in the prehispanic, colonial, and post-colonial Andean world. Many contributors to this volume were inspired theoretically by studies in cultural anthropology (Alberti et al 2011;Geertz 1973;Rappaport 1999;Turner 1969), particularly those within the Andean realm (e.g., Bastien 1978;Weismantel 1988). The goal of this volume is to synthesize archaeological studies of ritual specifically for the Andes by (1) exploring the various methods (e.g., architecture, ceramic styles, Geographic Information Systems) with which archaeologists identify ritual in the material record and (2) discussing the influence ritual had on the formation of, reproduction of, and changes in community life in past Andean societies.…”
Section: Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chapters in this volume address different dimensions and implications of ritual in the prehispanic, colonial, and post-colonial Andean world. Many contributors to this volume were inspired theoretically by studies in cultural anthropology (Alberti et al 2011;Geertz 1973;Rappaport 1999;Turner 1969), particularly those within the Andean realm (e.g., Bastien 1978;Weismantel 1988). The goal of this volume is to synthesize archaeological studies of ritual specifically for the Andes by (1) exploring the various methods (e.g., architecture, ceramic styles, Geographic Information Systems) with which archaeologists identify ritual in the material record and (2) discussing the influence ritual had on the formation of, reproduction of, and changes in community life in past Andean societies.…”
Section: Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since agency-or the various capacities encompassed by this concept-is a fundamental quality on which taxonomies of being are based, knowing how it is attributed to various entities in different cultures is central to understand the cosmologies involved and, more specifically, their underlying ontologies. The far-reaching implications of this debate have led some scholars to speak of an "ontological turn" in social theory (Alberti et al 2011;Olsen 2010).…”
Section: Conclusion: the Nature Of Andean Christianitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In any case, with secularism being deconstructed, its unspoken ontological claims will have to be reexamined, and other possibilities considered (cf. Alberti et al 2011). We believe that all understanding is achieved by an interpretive process conducted against the background of a narrative, or "framing story" (Smith 2009).…”
Section: Secularism and Anthropology's Scientific Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeologists participating in this "ontological turn" are rethinking western axioms of being, agency, materiality, and relations and how they may impede deeper understandings of cultures with different ontological moorings (Alberti et al 2011). One group has rallied under the banner of "symmetrical archaeology," arguing for the interpenetration of people and non-human entities that essentially co-create one another (e.g., Olsen 2010; Webmoor and Witmore 2008;Witmore 2007).…”
Section: Embodiment Object Agency and Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%