Worlds, words, and spaces of resistance: Democracy and social media in consumer co-ops

Abstract

<jats:p> This article explores how members of one of the largest Canadian consumer co-ops, reacting to what they saw as an assault on its democratic principles, use social media to try resisting the attempt from the board of directors to change its governance rules. Building on the Economies of Worth and Critical discourse analysis joint framework that considers power relations in the justification context, we unveil two essential moments. Initially, our analysis points to hegemonic justification struggles marked by the board and resisting consumer-members drawing on and reordering multiple worlds to debate the risk of democratic degeneration in consumer co-ops. Second, the critical insights suggest that the hegemonic control over the official deliberative arena pushed dissenting actors toward social media, an alternative space where they could deconstruct the co-ops-controlled discursive arena and create new conditions of possibility. Our article contributes to the literature on democratic degeneration in alternative organizations. More specifically, in the case of large consumer co-ops in which consumer-members have limited embodied presence, our results highlight how social media can offer a new space for debates, dissensus, and critical deconstruction. Our research also extends the post-structural criticism of the domination tendency of rational debate frameworks by showing that strategic displacement to new alternative spaces is essential to create new possibilities beyond those in central discursive arenas. </jats:p>

Moral responses to uncertainty: The economies of worth towards a reconceptualization of decision making and management

“…This pragmatic approach, which often uses the ontological apparatus of the EoW-map organically and not selectively, seeks to bring together individual agency and institutionalized structures by constructing an intermediate processual layer. This move supports conceptualization and research of the legitimacy-maintaining competence of stakeholders (Baba and Mailhot, 2016;Jaumiers, Daudigeous and de Latour, 2017;Munzer, 2019;Wright, 2012, 2013;Ottoson and Galis, 2011;Patriotta, Gond and Schultz, 2011;Reinecke, van Bommel and Spicer, 2017;Rolandsson, 2015;Taupin, 2012); the interactions of justification and power relations (Barros and Michaud, 2019;Gond et al, 2016); the interpretation of institutions by actors in the field (Finch, Geiger and Harkness, 2017;Gherardi and Perrotta, 2016;Kaplan and Murray, 2010;Oldenhof, Posstma and Putters, 2014;Whelan and Gond, 2017); the political reproduction function of rhetorical strategies (Nyberg, Wright and Kirk, 2017); and the moral microfoundations of organizational complexity (Demers and Gond, 2020;Passetti and Rinaldi, 2020).…”

In search of alternatives for individualised workers: A comparative study of freelance organisations

“…The desire of many scholars to prefigure and make visible alternatives to capitalism has given rise to a flourishing debate on alternative organisations (see Gibson-Graham, 1996; Parker et al, 2007, 2014a; Zanoni, 2020; Zanoni et al, 2017). Empirical cases, such as intentional communities, workers-owned cooperatives, community currencies, local exchange trading systems or open-source communities have thus been increasingly discussed by organisational scholars (Barros and Michaud, 2020; Bousalham and Vidaillet, 2018; Daskalaki et al, 2015; Dey et al, 2016; Esper et al, 2017; Meyer and Hudon, 2017). Such organisations are often defined by difference, as opposed ‘to the familiar, traditional, mainstream, predominant, or hegemonic institutional arrangements’ (Cheney et al, 2014: 1) or ‘to the orthodox, hierarchical, for-profit organisation’ (Diefenbach, 2019: 552).…”

“…In particular, Parker et al (2014b) propose the concept of responsibility, while Wright (2013) talks about sustainability, to underline that alternative organisations should worry about ‘the sorts of people [they] create and the sort of organisational arrangements that they make and that make them’ (Parker et al, 2014b: 632). By encouraging horizontal methods and the construction of non-hierarchical relations, the responsibility principle therefore also includes the defence of democracy, pointed out by many authors as a constituent component of an alternative organisation (Atzeni, 2012; Atzeni and Vieta, 2014; Barros and Michaud, 2020; Cheney, 2005, 2014; Harnecker, 2012; Kokkinidis, 2015; Wright, 2013).…”

Whistleblowing advocacy: Solidarity and fascinance

“…Since Durkheim's (2013Durkheim's ( [1902) influential work, solidarity has been a focus for scholars of organisational practices and processes, including studies of resistance to organisational power and domination (e.g. Barros and Michaud, 2020;Zanoni and Janssens, 2007). Without effective solidarity, change is elusive.…”