2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worldwide prevalence of hypospadias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
113
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
113
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend was first detected in the late 60s, 10 then later in Hungary and the United Kingdom, 11,12 followed by Oceania, North America 13,14 and the Scandinavian countries. 2,15 Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals, 16 changes in the maternal age repartition, or increased surgical success with hypospadiac boys reaching paternity themselves, 17 may all be contributing factors. These data have nevertheless been questioned.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend was first detected in the late 60s, 10 then later in Hungary and the United Kingdom, 11,12 followed by Oceania, North America 13,14 and the Scandinavian countries. 2,15 Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals, 16 changes in the maternal age repartition, or increased surgical success with hypospadiac boys reaching paternity themselves, 17 may all be contributing factors. These data have nevertheless been questioned.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported incidence is 0.2% to 1% . However, a recent review of the literature regarding the worldwide prevalence of hypospadias reported geographic, regional, and ethnic differences, with an extreme heterogeneity of published studies and contradictory reports on rising hypospadias rates …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…§Incidence (per 100 000) and mortality (per 100 000) of renal cell carcinoma from Znaor et al . ¶Incidence of hypospadias (per 10 000 birth); Japan from Kurahashi et al ., USA from Springer et al . ††Prevalence of stone disease; Japan from Yasui et al ., USA from Scales et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%