2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.904873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Would Chinese Men Who Have Sex With Men Take Up Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Screening as an Alternative Prevention Strategy to HPV Vaccination?

Abstract: BackgroundMen who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. A community-based organization (CBO)-private clinic service model promoting HPV vaccination among MSM was implemented in Hong Kong. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this service model in increasing HPV screening among MSM.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of the CBO-private clinic service model in increasing HPV screening among MSM. Participants were Hong Kong Chinese-speaking MSM a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at a high risk of infecting HPV ( 38 ). Men should be vaccinated to protect themselves and their future sexual partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at a high risk of infecting HPV ( 38 ). Men should be vaccinated to protect themselves and their future sexual partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After controlling for confounders such as age, household income, literacy, and self-efficacy, the results revealed that the association between the FHS-SF and vaccination was statistically significant (χ 2 = 47.81, P < 0.001) in a non-linear fashion (χ 2 = 9.96, P = 0.0016). When the FHS-SF value was lower than P50 (38), the hindering effect on HPV vaccination was significant, and the negative effect weakened or disappeared as the family health level increased (Figure 2).…”
Section: Trends In the Influence Of Family Health On Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors at the individual level also included some modifiable factors, such as perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived severity, and perceived susceptibility. Previous studies showed that interventions targeting modifiable factors (e.g., perceived benefits and perceived barriers) are effective in increasing vaccination uptake [ 59 , 60 , 61 ]. Factors at the interpersonal level included the influences of others (e.g., relatives/friends/spouses/health professionals).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%