2012
DOI: 10.5812/hepatmon.6227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Would the Physicians Eventually Obsolete the Liver Biopsy for the Assessment of Liver Fibrosis?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liver biopsy still has an important role in the estimation of liver fibrosis stage, but it is not very far that this invasive method will completely replace with the other noninvasive methods such as serum based biomarkers [70]. Therefore development of non-invasive methods is still needed and we should work harder for finding an appropriate method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liver biopsy still has an important role in the estimation of liver fibrosis stage, but it is not very far that this invasive method will completely replace with the other noninvasive methods such as serum based biomarkers [70]. Therefore development of non-invasive methods is still needed and we should work harder for finding an appropriate method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these factors can lead to a misdiagnosis of the “fibrosis” that is present. However, the combination with serum marker of fibrosis can increase the usefulness of the LSM in clinical practice, although with a potential increase of costs (9). Despite these intrinsic limitations, the use of LSM was introduced both in Europe and in the USA with an explicit role in the evaluation of transplanted liver (10, 11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%