2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wound-healing response and refractive regression after conductive keratoplasty

Abstract: The histological changes that occur after CK may be responsible for the well-established regression of its refractive effect. A better understanding of the wound-healing response after CK is necessary to improve the long-term stability of the procedure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact confirms from a mechanical standpoint that the woundhealing is very likely to play the major role in the commonly observed decrease in the initial degree of the refractive correction (Esquenazi et al 2006). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This fact confirms from a mechanical standpoint that the woundhealing is very likely to play the major role in the commonly observed decrease in the initial degree of the refractive correction (Esquenazi et al 2006). …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A cinching effect is thus obtained that increases the curvature of the central cornea, yielding the desired result. Although the procedure is far less invasive and risky than ablative ones, the post-operative follow-up shows that the initial degree of refractive correction tends to decrease 20% in 24 months' time (McDonald 2005;Esquenazi et al 2006) so that the predictability of the outcome cannot be considered completely satisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important feature of CEC is their ability to synthesize and deposit collagens into their ECM. Collagen synthesis was investigated previously in corneal endothelium in vivo and in vitro in several species at different developmental stages [Ben-Zvi et al, 1986;Kay et al, 1993;Levy et al, 1995;Funderburgh et al, 2003;Esquenazi et al, 2006]. It could be shown that collagen IV is the main collagen produced by normal CEC and is also the main component of Descemet's membrane, while collagen III can be detected in the ECM of normal bovine CEC, but is barely detectable in the ECM of normal rabbit CEC [Kay et al, 1993].…”
Section: Clonal Cell Lines Of Human Corneal Endothelium Cells Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only few groups reported on collagen III in the human corneal endothelium; for example, BenZvi et al [1986] state that collagen III was detected in the human cornea during embryonic development in Descemet's and Bowman's membrane, but could not be detected in the central cornea anymore after the 27th week of gestation. On the other hand, other groups reported the finding of collagen III during corneal wound healing [Funderburgh et al, 2003;Esquenazi et al, 2006] or in pathologic matrix deposits in the diseased corneal endothelium [Levy et al, 1995]. It is known from histological examinations of retrocorneal fibrous membranes that HCEC can transdifferentiate towards a fibroblastoid phenotype.…”
Section: Clonal Cell Lines Of Human Corneal Endothelium Cells Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%