2016
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2016)024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wrapping corrections for non-diagonal boundaries in AdS/CFT

Abstract: Abstract:We consider an open string stretched between a Y = 0 brane and a Y θ = 0 brane. The latter brane is rotated with respect to the former by an angle θ, and is described by a non-diagonal boundary S-matrix. This system interpolates smoothly between the Y − Y (θ = 0) and the Y −Ȳ (θ = π/2) systems, which are described by diagonal boundary S-matrices. We use integrability to compute the energies of one-particle states at weak coupling up to leading wrapping order (4, 6 loops) as a function of the angle. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the analysis of determinant operators is much less developed. The spectrum of small deformations of determinant operators was analyzed using various approaches [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] including integrability [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. However, not much work has been done on correlation functions 3 except in the protected BPS sector [37][38][39] and in the free field limit, where various interesting structures were found using algebraic [40], combinatorial [41][42][43] and coherent state [44] approaches.…”
Section: Jhep07(2020)037mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the analysis of determinant operators is much less developed. The spectrum of small deformations of determinant operators was analyzed using various approaches [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] including integrability [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. However, not much work has been done on correlation functions 3 except in the protected BPS sector [37][38][39] and in the free field limit, where various interesting structures were found using algebraic [40], combinatorial [41][42][43] and coherent state [44] approaches.…”
Section: Jhep07(2020)037mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5.25) 33 Written explicitly, ∂ u p(u) = −1/(u 2 + 1/4). 34 Note that we have different normalizations for G SU(2) ± as compared to G ± in [89]. The ones in [89] are normalized in the momentum basis whereas ours are normalized in the rapidity basis.…”
Section: Matrix Trace and Matrix Product Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the analysis of determinant operators is much less developed. The spectrum of small deformations of determinant operators was analyzed using various approaches [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] including integrability [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. However, not much work has been done on correlation functions except in the protected BPS sector [35][36][37] and in the free field limit, where various interesting structures were found using algebraic [38], combinatorial [39][40][41] and coherent state [42] approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this is yet another set of nontrivial asymptotics in the QSC, it is clearly an important question how to classify all possible types of asymptotics. They should correspond to some kind of deformations and boundary problems for local or nonlocal observables likely including the setups studied in [28,29]. Consistency of asymptotics with the functional QSC equations appears to be a highly nontrivial constraint giving hope for an exhaustive description.…”
Section: Jhep12(2016)122mentioning
confidence: 99%