Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Demonstratio 2015
DOI: 10.3115/v1/n15-3022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WriteAhead2: Mining Lexical Grammar Patterns for Assisted Writing

Abstract: This paper describes WriteAhead2, an interactive writing environment that provides lexical and grammatical suggestions for second language learners, and helps them write fluently and avoid common writing errors. The method involves learning phrase templates from dictionary examples, and extracting grammar patterns with example phrases from an academic corpus. At run-time, as the user types word after word, the actions trigger a list after list of suggestions. Each successive list contains grammar patterns and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One writing support tool, WriteAway (http://writeaway.nlpweb.org), for example, provides lexical and grammatical suggestions with phrase examples based on an academic corpus while a word is being typed. The rationale behind this design is that “learner writers sorely need concrete writing suggestions, right in the context of writing” and that “[l]earners could be more effectively assisted, if CALL tools provide such suggestions as learners write away” (Chang & Chang, , p. 106). Precisely the same reasoning applies to our new pedagogical tool, which is designed to facilitate the use and learning of move‐specific bundles in the research article genre.…”
Section: Rationale For Developing a Support Tool For Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One writing support tool, WriteAway (http://writeaway.nlpweb.org), for example, provides lexical and grammatical suggestions with phrase examples based on an academic corpus while a word is being typed. The rationale behind this design is that “learner writers sorely need concrete writing suggestions, right in the context of writing” and that “[l]earners could be more effectively assisted, if CALL tools provide such suggestions as learners write away” (Chang & Chang, , p. 106). Precisely the same reasoning applies to our new pedagogical tool, which is designed to facilitate the use and learning of move‐specific bundles in the research article genre.…”
Section: Rationale For Developing a Support Tool For Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some models can be developed using very small data (between 1 to 100 examples) [10,85,158], the others require much larger data. If the training needs more data (around 100 to few thousands of examples) which is often the case for fine-tuned models, we categorize them as medium [37,97,255,256,271]. For larger datasets (around tens of 1000s of examples) we denote this as large [56,207,257].…”
Section: Dimensions and Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second stage of the learning algorithm (Step (2) in Figure 2), we extract reference information. First, we extract grammar patterns from Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA 1 ) using an existing method (in Figure 3) described in Chang and Chang (2015). Subsequently, we store examples corresponded to a keyword's grammar patterns (e.g., (discuss, V n): issue, topic, matters).…”
Section: Learning To Provide Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%