2008
DOI: 10.2989/salals.2008.26.1.9.424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writer's stance in disciplinary discourses: A developmental view

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study analysing writer's stance in different disciplinary discourses (Paxton et al, 2008) raises issues around self-representation in a discipline such as literary studies. In this study, done at the University of Cape Town's Writing Centre, Hyland's five markers of writer's stance (hedges, emphatics, attitude markers, relational markers and person markers) were applied to the analysis of texts from the disciplines of linguistics, economics, health sciences and engineering; but it is the analysis of the text from literary studies that is of most interest here.…”
Section: Literature As An Interpretive Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study analysing writer's stance in different disciplinary discourses (Paxton et al, 2008) raises issues around self-representation in a discipline such as literary studies. In this study, done at the University of Cape Town's Writing Centre, Hyland's five markers of writer's stance (hedges, emphatics, attitude markers, relational markers and person markers) were applied to the analysis of texts from the disciplines of linguistics, economics, health sciences and engineering; but it is the analysis of the text from literary studies that is of most interest here.…”
Section: Literature As An Interpretive Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, done at the University of Cape Town's Writing Centre, Hyland's five markers of writer's stance (hedges, emphatics, attitude markers, relational markers and person markers) were applied to the analysis of texts from the disciplines of linguistics, economics, health sciences and engineering; but it is the analysis of the text from literary studies that is of most interest here. In his analysis of a text on literary theory, Chihota (Paxton et al, 2008) convincingly illustrates the frequent use of hedges that establish tentativeness, the minimal use of attitude markers and the almost complete absence of personal opinion, which are seen as characteristic of literary discourse. Such impersonality is common in writing about such abstract content as literary theory.…”
Section: Literature As An Interpretive Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this deficit view of students has been strongly contested. 'Academic literacies' research has shown that institutional discourse and pedagogical practices often position students disadvantageously, limiting performance and constraining identities Paxton et al 2008). It is thus important for writing centres to be able to make explicit the discursive and rhetorical moves involved in disciplinary writing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%