2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10643-016-0794-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing and Publishing Qualitative Studies in Early Childhood Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Semi-structured interviews were determined to be the most appropriate method for data collection to explore teachers' experiences, beliefs or motivation, and gain a detailed insight into their practice (Kumar 2014;McKenney and Reeves 2012;Saracho 2017). Interview questions were determined from the literature review, which indicated the variety of ways in which both pedagogy and individual skills were referred to, highlighting a difference in the use of language.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semi-structured interviews were determined to be the most appropriate method for data collection to explore teachers' experiences, beliefs or motivation, and gain a detailed insight into their practice (Kumar 2014;McKenney and Reeves 2012;Saracho 2017). Interview questions were determined from the literature review, which indicated the variety of ways in which both pedagogy and individual skills were referred to, highlighting a difference in the use of language.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last decade has witnessed a growing trend in the employment of systematic reviews to enhance evidence-based policy development and advocacy (Lohr, 2004; Snilstveit et al, 2012). The impetus for ‘evidence’ is widely recognised by researchers in a range of fields including education and the early years to explore solutions to improve the quality of childcare and education of young children (Cutspec, 2004; Pawson, 2002; Pring and Thomas, 2004; Saracho, 2016). Systematic reviews in early childhood research has been associated with the ‘gold standard’ randomised controlled trial (RCT) methodology in the thorough way it enables data to be scrutinised and compared (Penn, 2015).…”
Section: Systematic Reviews For ‘Evidence-based’ Early Childhood Advomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While recognising its limitations, the review process can also be a useful tool for analysing and evaluating studies. This is particularly relevant in a field such as early childhood that is largely dominated by qualitative and descriptive research, where researchers increasingly adopt qualitative datasets to advance theory, policy and practice (Saracho, 2016). The article examines what is understood by the term ‘systematic review’ and its relevance for how evidence is evaluated and applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%