1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0742-051x(96)00003-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
109
0
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
109
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…They also have found that students who do more than one non-traditional writing task can work on conceptual questions better than those who only do one writing task. Prain & Hand (1996) proposed five elements to guide the learning of writing in science: writing type, writing purpose, audience, topic, and method of text production. Studies in general show that writing for authentic audiences in various formats increases students' engagement, helps students learn better, and increases satisfaction in the teaching and learning process (Hand, Yang, & Bruxwoort, 2007; McDermoth & Kuhn, 2011;Wallace, 2007; Gunel, Hand & Mcdermott 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also have found that students who do more than one non-traditional writing task can work on conceptual questions better than those who only do one writing task. Prain & Hand (1996) proposed five elements to guide the learning of writing in science: writing type, writing purpose, audience, topic, and method of text production. Studies in general show that writing for authentic audiences in various formats increases students' engagement, helps students learn better, and increases satisfaction in the teaching and learning process (Hand, Yang, & Bruxwoort, 2007; McDermoth & Kuhn, 2011;Wallace, 2007; Gunel, Hand & Mcdermott 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research in science education has been advocating the need to incorporate skills, such as reading and writing, into the science classroom because these skills are necessary in the process of doing science (e.g., Alexander et al, 2008;Fang et al, 2008;Prain & Hand, 1996). Simple lesson-based reading and writing assignments give students the opportunity to learn how to write and enjoy reading while simultaneously learning science.…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Approaches In Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, students who wrote creatively about science (rather than writing a typical report) felt that they had learned about both English and science during the course of the project (Alexander et al, 2008). This process of "writing-to-learn" has been discussed in recent science education literature and is shown to help students increase their understanding of science content as well as critical thinking skills (Prain & Hand, 1996).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Approaches In Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prain and Hand, 1996;Hand et al, 1999;Riggs and Kimbrough, 2002) and on discussing real issues, WebCT gave each student a means to express his or her views in spite of the large class size and the opportunity to receive credit for participating to the debate, something that would have been impossible in a traditional classroom with 250 students. The correlation between final grade and use of WebCT, and in particular of the Discussion tool, is interesting and intriguing.…”
Section: Course Notes 77mentioning
confidence: 99%