2005
DOI: 10.1177/003172170508601011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing for Publication: A Controlled Art

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of this observation, the specific goals of this study were to increase understanding of these journal operations as well as journal editors' decision making, expectations for manuscripts submitted to their journals, and expectations for those who review for their journals. This study is an extension of other studies focused on educational journals conducted on a bi-yearly basis by Henson (e.g., Henson, 2003, as described in Henson, 2005). Additional studies reporting results obtained from journal editors have been published (e.g., Brewer, Scherzer, Van Raalte, Petitpas, & Andersen, 2001;Lounds et al, 2001;Mayrath & Robinson, 2006;Nickerson, 2005;Wilczenski, Phelps, & Lawler, 1992), but they have been narrower in focus or are outdated.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In light of this observation, the specific goals of this study were to increase understanding of these journal operations as well as journal editors' decision making, expectations for manuscripts submitted to their journals, and expectations for those who review for their journals. This study is an extension of other studies focused on educational journals conducted on a bi-yearly basis by Henson (e.g., Henson, 2003, as described in Henson, 2005). Additional studies reporting results obtained from journal editors have been published (e.g., Brewer, Scherzer, Van Raalte, Petitpas, & Andersen, 2001;Lounds et al, 2001;Mayrath & Robinson, 2006;Nickerson, 2005;Wilczenski, Phelps, & Lawler, 1992), but they have been narrower in focus or are outdated.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, automated reminders could be used to prompt reviewers days before deadlines and after deadlines have been exceeded (see Caruso & Kennedy, 2004). A goal of consistently providing editorial decisions in 2 months appears to be a reasonable goal in the electronic age (Henson, 2005); long review periods (and long publication lags) are detrimental to scientific progress (Cooper, 2009). …”
Section: Considerations For Editors and Journal Editorial Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides lack of writing skill, barriers may also derive from the disparity between the academics" research knowledge and the current research trend [16]. It is pivotal for academics to keep abreast with their own discipline if they wish to publish their article in a journal [17]. The study focused on what editors want authors to submit.…”
Section: Iiwriting For Publication: Underlying Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study involved 50 editors from a reputable journal in education. Drawing on data from survey questionnaires, it was revealed found that "editors are looking for articles that contribute something significant to the field" [18], and this will not be possible if the author does not update their knowledge in the discipline.…”
Section: Iiwriting For Publication: Underlying Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation