Writing, reading, and critiquing reviews

Archibald, Douglas; Martimianakis, Maria Athina

doi:10.36834/cmej.72945

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our narrative review findings will identify key trends and issues from the literature evidence, and help to generate research topic areas for future exploration. 41 The review findings will also deepen our understanding of the nature of the recognition and reward problem internationally, and in particular within Canada. The purpose of the latter focus is to determine what contributions can be made to improving policies and practices within Canadian medical education settings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to recognizing and rewarding clinician teachers’ performances and achievements: a narrative review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Over the last 31 years, there have been several institutional efforts to better recognize and reward clinician teachers. However, the perception of inadequate recognition and rewards by clinician teachers for their clinical teaching performance and achievements remains. The objective of this narrative review is two-fold: deepen understanding of the attributes of excellent clinician teachers considered for recognition and reward decisions and identify the barriers clinician teachers face in receiving recognition and rewards. Methods: We searched OVID Medline, Embase, Education Source and Web of Science to identify relevant papers published between 1990 and 2020. After screening for eligibility, we conducted a content analysis of the findings from 43 relevant papers to identify key trends and issues in the literature. Results: We found the majority of relevant papers from the US context, a paucity of relevant papers from the Canadian context, and a declining international focus on the attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to the recognition and rewarding of clinician teachers since 2010. ‘Provides feedback’, ‘excellent communication skills’, ‘good supervision’, and ‘organizational skills’ were common cognitive attributes considered for recognition and rewards. ‘Stimulates’, ‘passionate and enthusiastic’, and ‘creates supportive environment’, were common non-cognitive attributes considered for recognition and rewards. The devaluation of teaching, unclear criteria, and unreliable metrics were the main barriers to the recognition and rewarding of clinician teachers. Conclusions: The findings of our narrative review highlight a need for local empirical research on recognition and reward issues to better inform local, context-specific reforms to policies and practices.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to recognizing and rewarding clinician teachers’ performances and achievements: a narrative review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Commentary to the article “A CHAT(GPT) about the future of scientific publishing”

Ortiz

2023

Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Thank you from the Chief Editor (2022–2024)

Riha

2024

Eur Respir Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extract Review papers are essential in a world where the expansion of information and scientific knowledge have become astronomical in most domains [1–3]. As secondary research publications, review papers exist to both summarise and synthesise previously published work in a field, and in the process offer appraisal and critique. Accordingly, a review paper is considered to be of good quality if it is analytical, critical, comprehensive, selective, relevant, synthetic and fully referenced. A well written review provides the framework for highlighting new perspectives, insights and deficiencies on which further research endeavour can be based [1–3].

show abstract

Writing, reading, and critiquing reviews

Cited by 3 publications

References 27 publications

Attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to recognizing and rewarding clinician teachers’ performances and achievements: a narrative review

Attributes of excellent clinician teachers and barriers to recognizing and rewarding clinician teachers’ performances and achievements: a narrative review

Commentary to the article “A CHAT(GPT) about the future of scientific publishing”

Thank you from the Chief Editor (2022–2024)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About