2012
DOI: 10.52086/001c.31147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing the self into research: Using grounded theory analytic strategies in autoethnography

Abstract: Autoethnography -a qualitative research method that combines characteristics of ethnography and autobiography -is gaining momentum within the creative and performing arts as a research tool, partly because of the opportunity it provides for writers, artists, performers and others to reflect critically upon their personal and professional creative experiences. In recent years, 'analytic autoethnography' has been proposed as an alternative to traditional 'evocative autoethnography' for researchers who want to pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Codes included, coming out, workplace symbols of LGBTQ + inclusion, role models and leadership. Theoretical memos were used to capture and record the emerging theory, accumulating and maturing as the analysis progressed (Pace, 2012). In the second phase of grounded theory analysis, theoretical coding determined how emergent concepts related to each other (Charmaz, 2006).…”
Section: Focus Group Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Codes included, coming out, workplace symbols of LGBTQ + inclusion, role models and leadership. Theoretical memos were used to capture and record the emerging theory, accumulating and maturing as the analysis progressed (Pace, 2012). In the second phase of grounded theory analysis, theoretical coding determined how emergent concepts related to each other (Charmaz, 2006).…”
Section: Focus Group Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the study has taken an analytic autoethnography approach—data provide insight into and are used to “develop, refine and extend theoretical understanding” of social phenomena (Anderson, 2006; Le Roux, 2017, p. 201; Pace, 2012).…”
Section: Autoethnography As Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was precisely at this point, moved by a progressive interest in ethnography, when this author started a second stage of interpretation oriented by the five basic stages of analytic autoethnography as defined by Anderson (2006): (1) complete member researcher status (obvious here due to a highly individual goal and setting), (2) analytic reflexivity (already started with the original fieldnotes), (3) narrative visibility of the researcher's self (both through quantitative and qualitative data in this case), (4) dialogue with informants beyond the self (which was troubled, as indicated below), and (5) commitment to theoretical analysis (which required further readings and literature reviews). Therefore a later part of the research, as a sort of reflexive distillation, was informed by reading about similar experiences of digital disengagement from ethnographers and other researchers working on this topic, and correspondingly adding a retrospective interpretation of each of the 112 fieldnotes as a "grounded" approach (Pace, 2012), mainly during January 2022.…”
Section: Basic Setting Sharing and Connection To Analytic Autoethnogr...mentioning
confidence: 99%