2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9345.00179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing: the state of the state vs. the state of the art in English and American schools

Abstract: Based on work undertaken in a joint international project focusing on the process and teaching of writing in English/US classrooms, this article looks at the impact government initiatives on assessment and accountability have on classroom practices and the process of writing. These initiatives are encoded in the Standard Assessment Tasks (SATs) in England and the Proficiency Tests in the US. The first year of the project has gathered and analyzed data from a longitudinal study of writing in the US, focused on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They were then able to integrate the stylistic and organisational features of these texts into their personal repertoires and use them successfully in their own writing. This engagement in what Messenheimer and Packwood (2002) call deep, rather than surface learning is crucial if children are to move beyond technically adept but formulaic writers to become autonomous creative authors. Barrs and Cork (2001) show how young writers echo the styles and rhythms of texts that have been read aloud and explored through discussion and drama.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were then able to integrate the stylistic and organisational features of these texts into their personal repertoires and use them successfully in their own writing. This engagement in what Messenheimer and Packwood (2002) call deep, rather than surface learning is crucial if children are to move beyond technically adept but formulaic writers to become autonomous creative authors. Barrs and Cork (2001) show how young writers echo the styles and rhythms of texts that have been read aloud and explored through discussion and drama.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirements of standardised testing can result in a reduction of choice for pupils in subject, form and audience (Wiggins, 1993;Moss, 1994) and the 2003 KS2 assessment tests remove pupil choice entirely, with a choice of content but not of genre at KS1. The backwash of such test parameters has the potential to reduce pupils' autonomy still further, and may curtail their sense of volition and shape their attitudes and motivation accordingly, unless we are professionally vigilant and avoid a n instrumental approach to teaching writing (Messenheimer and Packwood, 2002).…”
Section: Desire For Autonomy In Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical thinking is necessary element for learning of science. So, teacher can fulfill the demands of national standards through his/her teaching by achieving the high rate (Messenheimer & Packwood, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%