2012
DOI: 10.4324/9780203832400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

28
394
2
42

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 406 publications
(466 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
28
394
2
42
Order By: Relevance
“…As argued by Bitchener and Ferris (2012), few teachers carry out research on feedback. Several researchers have highlighted the need for teacher research due to reasons such as the need for useful results, field-based research which looks at CF in practice (Bitchener & Ferris 2012), finding effects of teacher feedback practices (Magno & Amarles 2011) and investigating naturalistic exposure in classroom settings (Ferris 2010;Storch & Wigglesworth 2010). Moreover, it is difficult to examine the relationship between the learners and the teacher who gives the feedback with experimental methods (Ellis 2010;Ellis et al 2008).…”
Section: Teacher Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As argued by Bitchener and Ferris (2012), few teachers carry out research on feedback. Several researchers have highlighted the need for teacher research due to reasons such as the need for useful results, field-based research which looks at CF in practice (Bitchener & Ferris 2012), finding effects of teacher feedback practices (Magno & Amarles 2011) and investigating naturalistic exposure in classroom settings (Ferris 2010;Storch & Wigglesworth 2010). Moreover, it is difficult to examine the relationship between the learners and the teacher who gives the feedback with experimental methods (Ellis 2010;Ellis et al 2008).…”
Section: Teacher Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, this category can be related to learners' proficiency level, i.e., adult beginners. As recommended by Bitchener and Ferris (2012), low-level language students need more CWF as they are intensively acquiring the L2 lexicon, morphology and syntax. Therefore, teachers need to focus their attention on form.…”
Section: Teacher Feedback On Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, this set of studies is messier, more problematic, and more difficult to interpret than the revision studies (Bitchener & Ferris, 2012). For example, in most of the studies, a no-feedback control group was not included in the design and the absence of a control group makes it hard to argue that written CF alone led to any measurable improvements.…”
Section: The Effectiveness Of Written Cfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from illustrative pictures, other possible ways, such as one-on-one conferences or mini-lessons to small groups of learners, may also help to enrich the micro context of the provided WCF to such an extent that learners can be actively involved in the process of internalizing feedback. Future empirical studies that aim to investigate the extent to which these and other micro contextual variables can enhance the efficiency of WCF are strongly appealed for so that new implications for L2 teaching practice could be gained (Bitchener & Ferris, 2012).…”
Section: Change On Form-oriented Wcf Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%