2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Written participation with response technology – How teachers ask and students respond with applied text response functionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the acquisition of grades obtained can show the results of the completion of learning carried out by students (Puyada et al, 2018). In addition, according to Einum (2020) students are motivated and serious in using e-modules by obtaining 83% with positive responses. The use of e-modules can make it more interactive and student engagement is higher (Zarzour et al, 2020).…”
Section: Process Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the acquisition of grades obtained can show the results of the completion of learning carried out by students (Puyada et al, 2018). In addition, according to Einum (2020) students are motivated and serious in using e-modules by obtaining 83% with positive responses. The use of e-modules can make it more interactive and student engagement is higher (Zarzour et al, 2020).…”
Section: Process Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CRSs have been around for a while, studies on how to use them efficiently are still rare, and adoption rates remain rather low. , Some features of CRSs such as free text, numerical input, continuous feedback to the lecturer (e.g., on speed of lecture and level of confusion), and their potential for collecting responses are rarely reflected upon in the literature. There is a lack of systematic studies beyond isolated usage of CRSs, employing measures for reliability and validity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%