1989
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-341831-9.50008-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wrought Non–Heat-Treatable Aluminum Alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the presence of 4.25% Mg provides a high level of strain-hardening during formation [18], it usually exhibits continuous intergrannular beta-phase (Al 8 Mg 5 ) precipitates with little precipitation within the grains. The betaphase precipitates are anodic to the aluminum-magnesium matrix, and the formation of a continuous grain boundary network of beta-phase precipitates enhances susceptibility to localized attack to include stress corrosion cracking and pitting corrosion [1,2,19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the presence of 4.25% Mg provides a high level of strain-hardening during formation [18], it usually exhibits continuous intergrannular beta-phase (Al 8 Mg 5 ) precipitates with little precipitation within the grains. The betaphase precipitates are anodic to the aluminum-magnesium matrix, and the formation of a continuous grain boundary network of beta-phase precipitates enhances susceptibility to localized attack to include stress corrosion cracking and pitting corrosion [1,2,19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Como os teores de cobre e magnésio são altos, ocorre um oferecimento ao endurecimento bastante elevado, conforme propõe a literatura (Sanders, Baumann & Stumpf, 1986). …”
Section: Resultados E Discussõesunclassified
“…Magnesium in solution imparts a limited solution-hardening effect on the Al matrix, but the most important influence is its ability to promote the strengthening of Al through work-hardening. The hardening effect of Mg in Al is more efficient in the dilute range (<1 at.%) than in the more concentrated range (Sanders et al, 1989).…”
Section: (A) and (B)mentioning
confidence: 98%