2020
DOI: 10.2499/p15738coll2.133681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WTO dispute settlement cases involving the agreement on agriculture, 1995–2019

Abstract: in 1975, provides research-based policy solutions to sustainably reduce poverty and end hunger and malnutrition. IFPRI's strategic research aims to foster a climate-resilient and sustainable food supply; promote healthy diets and nutrition for all; build inclusive and efficient markets, trade systems, and food industries; transform agricultural and rural economies; and strengthen institutions and governance. Gender is integrated in all the Institute's work. Partnerships, communications, capacity strengthening,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Worse, they threaten to undermine liberalization trends by raising tariff levels and placing importing decisions back into the hands of STEs and other government entities. A functioning WTO DSB helps ensure compliance with WTO trade rules, but the current impasse over appointing new members of the Appellate Body undermines its function (Bown and Irwin, 2019;Glauber and Xing, 2020;Mavroidis and Sapir, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Worse, they threaten to undermine liberalization trends by raising tariff levels and placing importing decisions back into the hands of STEs and other government entities. A functioning WTO DSB helps ensure compliance with WTO trade rules, but the current impasse over appointing new members of the Appellate Body undermines its function (Bown and Irwin, 2019;Glauber and Xing, 2020;Mavroidis and Sapir, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2018, in response to duties placed on China goods by the United States, China placed counter-retaliatory duties on a number of US agricultural exports, including soybeans. Total US agricultural exports to China fell to $9.1 billion in 2019 and soybean exports fell by almost 75 per cent, to USD 3.1 billion, the lowest level since 2006 (Glauber, 2020). Brazil was a big beneficiary as China sourced most of its soybean imports from them in 2018 and 2019, and while the United States was able to send some of its soybeans to markets that would have normally china's wto accession and global agricultural trade imported from Brazil, overall, US soybean exports fell by USD 4 billion in 2018 and USD 3 billion in 2019 and US soybean receipts in 2019 fell by 12 per cent from 2017 levels (Adjemian et al, 2021;Carter and Steinbach, 2020).…”
Section: (I) China's Trade War With the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%