Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Systems Security 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3380786.3391400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Afl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 The most negative ε values reported are from systems where TCE degraded in the presence of iron sulfide (−27.9‰). 30 Taken at face value, the results shown in Figure 4e indicate that multiple transformation pathways occurred in the PRB. About 70% of the estimated ε values were characteristic of abiotic TCE degradation (Fig.…”
Section: Tce and Daughter Productsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…31 The most negative ε values reported are from systems where TCE degraded in the presence of iron sulfide (−27.9‰). 30 Taken at face value, the results shown in Figure 4e indicate that multiple transformation pathways occurred in the PRB. About 70% of the estimated ε values were characteristic of abiotic TCE degradation (Fig.…”
Section: Tce and Daughter Productsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…28,30,56 Laboratory derived isotope trends are typically examined using the Rayleigh equation: δ 13 C -δ 13 C 0 ≈ εln(C/ C 0 ), where δ 13 C -δ 13 C 0 is the carbon isotope separation, for example, between TCE at time t and time zero, ε is the process-dependent bulk enrichment factor: (α−1)10 3 , and C/C 0 is the fraction of reactant remaining at time t. Thus, in batch studies bulk enrichment factors are determined by linear regression of δ 13 C -δ 13 C 0 versus ln(C/C 0 ) and this approach has shown promise for discriminating biotic and abiotic degradation pathways and for estimating the extent of TCE degradation. 27,28,30,31,56 Applying this method at PRB sites is challenging because multiple degradation processes are possible (so a unique value of ε cannot be assumed) and C 0 may vary widely in heterogeneous systems, e.g., in cases where influent TCE concentrations are not constant in time or space. We estimated C/C 0 by computing the molar ratio [TCE/(TCE+cis-DCE+VC +ethene+ethane)] in samples collected within and down-gradient of the PRB, assuming that measured daughter product concentrations correlate with the amount of degraded TCE and that concentrations of daughter products entering the PRB were negligible.…”
Section: Tce and Daughter Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 1. For the translation of the quotations in this article, see the following references: Knechtges, 1982; Legge, 1971; Liang, 2005; Waley, 1999; Watson, 1974, 2003; Xu, 2003; Yang and Yang, 2008; Zhai and Mou, 2010.…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 99%