1982
DOI: 10.1086/ntj41862452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Efficiency and State Formula Grants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transfers received by local governments in most OECD countries in recent decades affect their cost functions (Bergvall, Charbit, Kraan, & Merk, ). Silkman and Young () argued that inefficient behaviour is expected when funds are received from other institutions, because of fiscal illusion (Kalb, ; Moesen & van Cauwenberge, ). In their empirical research, Balaguer‐Coll et al (), De Borger and Kerstens (), Kalb () and Loikkanen and Susiluoto () concluded that transfers from other institutions stimulate cost inefficiency.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfers received by local governments in most OECD countries in recent decades affect their cost functions (Bergvall, Charbit, Kraan, & Merk, ). Silkman and Young () argued that inefficient behaviour is expected when funds are received from other institutions, because of fiscal illusion (Kalb, ; Moesen & van Cauwenberge, ). In their empirical research, Balaguer‐Coll et al (), De Borger and Kerstens (), Kalb () and Loikkanen and Susiluoto () concluded that transfers from other institutions stimulate cost inefficiency.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Spann 1977. 14 De Groot and Van der Sluis (1987), Silkman andYoung (1982), andWyckoff (1990). 15 Athanassopoulos and Triantis (1998), Chang (1990), andLiner (1994).…”
Section: Government-wide Economiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argued that public agencies, such as local governments, can perform better if the authorities, such as the national government, are "attentive, supportive, and delegative (p. 3)", yet they still provide the right amount of autonomy for local governments to pursue their mission. One study also showed how autonomy from the federal government led to higher levels of fiscal efficiency, as reflected by local districts' revenues [11,65]. Another study also exhibited how the central government's monitoring role led to the disclosure of local governments' revenue information, which provided motivation for the latter to perform better [10].…”
Section: Compliance With the National Government And Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 97%