2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.finel.2015.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-FEM modeling of dynamic ductile fracture problems with a nonlocal damage-viscoplasticity model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mesh independence is also confirmed by Broumand and Khoei (2015), who used a similar technique with a non local gradient damage model. Broumand and Khoei (2015) tested their method on 2D configurations with holes, which are close to the void growth and coalescence problems that are targeted in the present review. Their results are promising for future developments regarding matrix micro-cracking, given that these crack initiation and propagation criteria can be extended to 3D.…”
Section: Continuum Damage Modelsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mesh independence is also confirmed by Broumand and Khoei (2015), who used a similar technique with a non local gradient damage model. Broumand and Khoei (2015) tested their method on 2D configurations with holes, which are close to the void growth and coalescence problems that are targeted in the present review. Their results are promising for future developments regarding matrix micro-cracking, given that these crack initiation and propagation criteria can be extended to 3D.…”
Section: Continuum Damage Modelsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…On the one hand, when it comes to fracture problems at room temperature, the Lemaitre model seems to be adopted by most researchers (Vaz and Owen (2001) (2013)), for instance to model cold metal forming processes. It can be coupled to the Johnson-Cook elasto-viscoplastic model to address rate dependent problems (Broumand and Khoei (2015)). The Lemaitre model is based on a damage variable D and an effective stress definition σ eff = σ , first proposed by Kachanov (1958), which cor-1 D rects the conventional stress tensor σ to account for the presence of voids.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the standard Gauss points cannot be merely replaced during the analysis, as it is performed in the present implementation of the subdivision of elements and mapping method. In such case, strategies of Simone et al (2003), Unger et al (2007), Seabra et al (2011), Broumand and Khoei (2013, 2015), Wang and Waisman (2016) and Svenning et al (2019) can be considered to manage the transfer of state variable from the original to the new integration point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantage of these methods for problems in materials science is the simplification of the modelling of discontinuous phenomena. As already mentioned, in conventional finite element methods, the mesh has to be constructed so that element edges/faces coincide with the crack surface and nodes must be placed on each side of the crack to allow material separation along the crack surface [15], [16]. The representation of level set defines delamination crack by 2 fields which are orthogonally placed.…”
Section: Combination With Level Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%