1998
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.50.4.1074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with connexin 32 mutations

Abstract: Electrophysiologic and histologic findings support primary axonal neuropathy in CMTX with Cx32 mutations. Clinical and electrophysiologic data in males with different missense mutations in the of Cx32 gene differed significantly. Furthermore, males with a nonsense mutation (Arg22Stop) had earlier onset and a more severe phenotype than males with missense mutations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
131
0
11

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
13
131
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Nerve conduction velocities are typically in 30 -40 m/s in affected males and 30 -50 m/s in affected females (Nicholson and Nash, 1993;Rouger et al, 1997;Birouk et al, 1998;Hahn et al, 1999;Senderek et al, 1999); this is faster than the 20 m/s typically seen in CMT1A patients . In addition, electrophysiological studies pronounced loss of distal motor axons in CMT1X (Rozear et al, 1987;Hahn et al, 1990Hahn et al, , 1999Nicholson and Nash, 1993;Rouger et al, 1997;Birouk et al, 1998;Senderek et al, 1999). Finally, nerve biopsies show more axonal loss and less remyelination than is typically seen in CMT1A or CMT1B (Sander et al, 1998;Hahn et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nerve conduction velocities are typically in 30 -40 m/s in affected males and 30 -50 m/s in affected females (Nicholson and Nash, 1993;Rouger et al, 1997;Birouk et al, 1998;Hahn et al, 1999;Senderek et al, 1999); this is faster than the 20 m/s typically seen in CMT1A patients . In addition, electrophysiological studies pronounced loss of distal motor axons in CMT1X (Rozear et al, 1987;Hahn et al, 1990Hahn et al, , 1999Nicholson and Nash, 1993;Rouger et al, 1997;Birouk et al, 1998;Senderek et al, 1999). Finally, nerve biopsies show more axonal loss and less remyelination than is typically seen in CMT1A or CMT1B (Sander et al, 1998;Hahn et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Finally, nerve biopsies show more axonal loss and less remyelination than is typically seen in CMT1A or CMT1B (Sander et al, 1998;Hahn et al, 2001). These data have lead to the frequent supposition that CMT1X is an axonal neuropathy (Hahn et al, 1990;Timmerman et al, 1996;Birouk et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affected males with the CMT1X phenotype have moderate to severe symptoms, whereas heterozygous females are usually less affected with mild symptoms. The mMNCV typically ranges from 30 to 40 m/s in affected males with GJB1 mutation and 30-50 m/s in affected females with the CMT1X phenotype, which is faster than in patients with the demyelinating form and slower than in patients with the axonal form of CMT [11][12][13] .…”
Section: Inf2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle strengths of flexor and extensor muscles were assessed manually using the standard medical research council (MRC) scale. In order to determine physical disability, we used two scales, a functional disability scale (FDS) (Birouk et al 1998) and a CMT neuropathy score (CMTNS) (Shy et al 2005). Disease severity was determined for each patient using a nine-point FDS that was based on the following criteria: 0, normal; 1, normal but with cramps and fatigability; 2, an inability to run; 3, walking difficulty but unaided; 4, walking with a cane; 5, walking with crutches; 6, walking with a walker; 7, wheelchair bound; and 8, bedridden.…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplication is found in up to approximately 70% of patients with CMT1 (Szigeti et al 2006). Deletion of the same region by the unequal crossover is associated with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP, MIM# 162500) (Chance et al 1993;Mariman et al 1994). It is estimated that about 5Á24% of the duplication occur de novo (Hoogendijk et al 1992;Nelis et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%