1988
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130395029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-linked Retinitis Pigmentosa Profile of Clinical Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
68
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
68
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is consistent with the inference that most RP3 mutations are of independent origin. 24 Different clinical presentations have been recognised in XLRP, 3 and some genotype-phenotype correlations have been attempted in hemizygous males and heterozygous carrier female in XLRP families. [25][26][27]15 The location and nature of RPGR mutations might help to understand the molecular basis of XLRP and the role of the RPGR protein in photoreceptor function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is consistent with the inference that most RP3 mutations are of independent origin. 24 Different clinical presentations have been recognised in XLRP, 3 and some genotype-phenotype correlations have been attempted in hemizygous males and heterozygous carrier female in XLRP families. [25][26][27]15 The location and nature of RPGR mutations might help to understand the molecular basis of XLRP and the role of the RPGR protein in photoreceptor function.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…[1][2][3] At least two loci on the X chromosome can mutate to cause retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The first, RP2 (type 2), was recently identified by positional cloning in Xp11.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…XLRP is considered clinically severe, with early onset and rapid progression, often leading to severe visual handicap before the fourth decade [Bird, 1975;Fishman et al, 1988]. A milder phenotype is often present in female carriers, probably due to random X-inactivation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…It is inherited in autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant as well as X-linked manner. Patients exhibit symptoms of night blindness and loss of peripheral vision (due to rod death) in the first two decades of life, which is followed by complete blindness due to loss of cone photoreceptors [54][55]. Loss of cones can either be due to the fact that the causative gene is also expressed in cone photoreceptors or due to starvation or loss of availability of trophic factors secreted from the rods (majority cell type in photoreceptor layer; 95-97%) if the mutation is in a rod-specific gene [56][57].…”
Section: Non-syndromic Retinal Ciliopathiesmentioning
confidence: 48%