Electron transfer (ET) is a fundamental process underlying many chemical and biochemical reactions. [1,2] Over the years, a powerful arsenal of physicochemical methods has been employed to study ET. Although the principal methods employed have been optical, [2] other methods have been used, and in particular scanning electrochemical microscopy. [3] Nevertheless, there is still a need for novel and/or more flexible experimental approaches to the quantitative study of ET in both biological and chemical systems.Herein we make use of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy for studying ET in chemical and biological systems. It was established earlier that stable nitroxyl radicals (SNRs) can undergo redox reactions (Scheme 1) with concomitant conversion into diamagnetic species, that is, the corresponding hydroxylamine and oxoammonium cation. [4] This permits use of SNRs to monitor the ET process by following disappearance of their EPR signals. However, this approach has never been used to study the kinetics of ET reactions.A major problem in ET studies on biological systems is associated with the selective switching on and off of the electron donor/acceptor pair. This problem was successfully solved in studies on ET in complexes of ruthenium with cytochromes and blue copper proteins. Time-resolved optical spectroscopy utilized the laser flash-quench triggering method to excite the bound ruthenium complex that served as one donor/acceptor. The endogenous Fe 3+ /Fe 2+ or Cu 2+ / Cu + metal centers were the complementary acceptor/donors that served as endogenous antennae. [2,5] However this approach is limited to metal containing proteins. We have adopted a similar photo-switching approach, together with time-resolved EPR, for the donor/acceptor pair SNR/Ru 3+ . SNRs can indeed be oxidized by Ru 3+ , as earlier shown for TEMPO using laser flash photolysis. [4] The oxidation potential of 1.06 V versus Ag/AgCl, [6] for a [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ /[Ru-(bpy) 3 ] 3+ couple, is well above that of a typical nitroxide moiety, namely E 1/2 % 0.6 V. [4,7] The advantage of using a SNR is that the spin probe can be introduced at a desired location on the protein studied by use of site-directed spin labeling. [8] In the present study, which employs bacteriorhodopsin (bR), we further took advantage of the observation that bound Ca 2+ ions can successfully be replaced by various bulky metal complexes, including [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ . [9] An additional reason for using bR as a model protein for testing the proposed approach is the recent finding that bR in the solid state shows a high propensity to conduct electric currents. [10] The experimental procedure (see the Supporting Information for details) involved use of a laser pulse to raise [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 2+ to an excited state, [Ru*(bpy) 3 ] 2+ , which was quickly oxidized to [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 3+ by ammonium persulfate. In turn, [Ru(bpy) 3 ] 3+ oxidizes the SNR to the corresponding oxoammonium cation (Scheme 1). The subsequent decrease of the SNR was then followed in time by monitoring the contin...