2011
DOI: 10.1021/ja111323m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopic and Computational Investigation of a Possible S···S Interaction in the [Cu3S2]3+ Core

Abstract: The electronic structure of the [Cu3S2]3+ core of [(LCu)3(S)2]3+ (L = N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-2R,3R-cyclohexanediamine) is investigated using a combination of Cu and S K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy and calculations at the density functional and multireference second-order perturbation levels of theory. The results show that the [Cu3S2]3+ core is best described as having all copper centers close to, but more oxidized than, Cu2+, while the charge on the S2 fragment is between that of a sulfide (S2−) and a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
39
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, an unusual S⋅⋅⋅S distance in a Cu 3 S 2 compound3 has led to an animated debate about whether the compound contains a singly‐bonded S 2 2− unit or two non‐bonded S 2− ligands 4. One of us proposed that the Cu 3 S 2 compound may contain a half‐bonded S 2 3− , or “subsulfide”, ligand,5 though to date experimental support for this assignment is lacking, despite extensive investigations 6. The possibility that dichalcogen E 2 n − species could be redox non‐innocent ligands suggested that a potentially large number of reported compounds may be misassigned or are poorly understood.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, an unusual S⋅⋅⋅S distance in a Cu 3 S 2 compound3 has led to an animated debate about whether the compound contains a singly‐bonded S 2 2− unit or two non‐bonded S 2− ligands 4. One of us proposed that the Cu 3 S 2 compound may contain a half‐bonded S 2 3− , or “subsulfide”, ligand,5 though to date experimental support for this assignment is lacking, despite extensive investigations 6. The possibility that dichalcogen E 2 n − species could be redox non‐innocent ligands suggested that a potentially large number of reported compounds may be misassigned or are poorly understood.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of ongoing electronic structure discussions in which descriptors such as oxo-copper(III) and oxylcopper(II) are frequently advanced, an alternate formalism would invoke ligand based oxidation. 4, 6 Indeed, more recent work – in particular, by Berry and coworkers 7 – provide strong evidence in support of an alternate electronic structure: 8 a bridging subsulfide or S 2 3- couples antiferromagnetically to three copper(II) cations. As alluded to above, copper-oxygen species containing formally high oxidation states (e.g., Cu III ), are invoked as reactive intermediates in biological chemistry and catalysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Much of the available knowledge regarding copper sulphide clusters comes from studies of Cu 2 S 2 6 and Cu 3 S 2 7,8 model complexes, which feature bridging ligands with significant S-S interactions, 9 supported by nitrogen chelates. The latter category of complexes (Figure 1b), in particular, has been the subject of extensive experimental and computational characterization as well as fascinating literature discussions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter category of complexes (Figure 1b), in particular, has been the subject of extensive experimental and computational characterization as well as fascinating literature discussions. 911 However, none of these complexes truly model the unusual μ 4 -S bridge of N 2 OR or provide insight into reduced catalytic intermediates. Phosphine 12,13 ligands have been used to stabilize “fully reduced” Cu 4 (μ 4 -S) and Cu 3 (μ 3 -S) clusters more structurally faithful to N 2 OR (Figure 1c), but the inability thus far of these systems to access open-shell oxidation states has precluded experimental determination of electron structure using typical methods of physical inorganic chemistry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%