1986
DOI: 10.1016/0022-328x(86)80537-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray crystal structure of trimethylsilylmethyllithium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9] Of course it is not prudent to surmise that larger anions or larger polydentate donors will automatically result in smaller aggregates since electronic factors will also play an important role. While lithium complexes are often smaller (and consequently more soluble) oligomers, heavier sodium and potassium derivatives have a tendency to give larger insoluble polymers; for example, hexameric LiCH 2 SiMe 3 [10] is commercially available as a hexane solution yet its K congener is insoluble in the same medium. [11] Whereas judicious choice of anion and Lewis donor can disrupt the polymerization of lithium species, it is much more arduous to do so with Na or K complexes of simple organic anions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] Of course it is not prudent to surmise that larger anions or larger polydentate donors will automatically result in smaller aggregates since electronic factors will also play an important role. While lithium complexes are often smaller (and consequently more soluble) oligomers, heavier sodium and potassium derivatives have a tendency to give larger insoluble polymers; for example, hexameric LiCH 2 SiMe 3 [10] is commercially available as a hexane solution yet its K congener is insoluble in the same medium. [11] Whereas judicious choice of anion and Lewis donor can disrupt the polymerization of lithium species, it is much more arduous to do so with Na or K complexes of simple organic anions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, considerably less is known about the alkali metal compounds of the smallest and simplest member of this family of silyl-substituted methyl groups, namely the (trimethylsilyl)methyl (CH 2 SiMe 3 ) or monosyl group. [20] Again, the most examined (trimethylsilyl)methyl compound to date is the lithium congener, [(trimethylsilyl)methyl]lithium [Me 3 SiCH 2 Li] n , which is known to form a hexamer (n = 6) in the solid state, [21] whereas both N,N,NЈ,NЈ-tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA) and the (-)-sparteine adducts form dimers (n = 2), and the higher-denticity ligand N,N,NЈ,NЈЈ,NЈЈ-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) forms a monomer (n = 1). [22] [(Trimethylsilyl)methyl]potassium has been used in C-metallation reactions of cyclohexene, [23] toluene, [24] and tetrahydrofuran, [25] and in an N-metallation reaction of a secondary amine to form potassium 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidide [26] in situ, [27] which has recently been employed as a convenient precursor in synergic mixed-metal chemistry.…”
Section: Alkylmetal Compoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] To date only the donor free molecular structure of trimethylsilylmethyllithium [LiCH 2 SiMe 3 ] 6 (1) has been reported. [10] Because of the excellent storage features of crystalline trimethylsilylmethyllithium, it is perfectly applicable in silyl transfer reactions. [11] Herein, we report on the deaggregation of the hexameric trimethylsilylmethyllithium (1) with the nitrogen donor cbases TMEDA, (-)-sparteine and N,N,NЈ,NЈЈ,NЈЈ-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) (Figure 1) [(TMEDA)·LiCH 2 SiMe 3 ] 2 (2) crystallises in the monoclinic space group P2 1 /n ( Figure 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%