2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray, DFT, FTIR and NMR structural study of 2,3-dihydro-2-(R-phenylacylidene)-1,3,3-trimethyl-1H-indole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ν(CN) band was found at 2071 cm −1 and is indicative of nitrogen coordination in complex 1 rather than sulphur coordination to Co(II) ion (terminal N-bonded) [32]. Bands related to the phen ligand were observed at 1638, 1592, 1541 and 1511 cm −1 , as reported by others [33,34]. Similar bands were found at lower frequencies in free ligand.…”
Section: Ft-ir Spectrasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The ν(CN) band was found at 2071 cm −1 and is indicative of nitrogen coordination in complex 1 rather than sulphur coordination to Co(II) ion (terminal N-bonded) [32]. Bands related to the phen ligand were observed at 1638, 1592, 1541 and 1511 cm −1 , as reported by others [33,34]. Similar bands were found at lower frequencies in free ligand.…”
Section: Ft-ir Spectrasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Among these bonds, N–CO is found to have the lowest values of 1.406 Å in 8 and 9 , which is a direct consequence of the electron‐withdrawing tendency of the electronegative oxygen atom. The C1–N28 bond distance (1.424 Å) in 8 and C2–N13 bond distance (1.423 Å) in 9 are consistent with the X‐ray structure of indole derivatives reported earlier . However, in indole, this bond distance is shorter, 1.37 Å, indicating that substituent has an impact on the geometry of the indole moiety .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Quantum chemical calculations are considered powerful tools to verify spectral data including the prediction of 1 H and 13 C NMR chemical shifts [14][15][16], UV-Visible absorption bands [17][18][19] and X-ray structure parameters [20,21]. Reported studies proved that to predict the excited states of some natural compounds, the use of B3LYP and PBE0 hybrid functionals are appropriate to estimate the excited state energies [22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%