2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoso.2019.100396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray diffraction analysis of nanocomposite Fe3O4/activated carbon by Williamson–Hall and size-strain plot methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(right) and opposite trend for 5 gr of TiO2 in ZnO/TiO2 composite as can be seen in Figure 6. The best composite for photocatalyst is for low attenuating and propagating constant, means that the structure will easily suppressing recombination of the charge particle due to the higher strain between the atoms [52,54]. In this study shows 5 gr of TiO2 in ZnO/TiO2 composite high potentials compared than that of 2.5 gr TiO2 in ZnO/TiO2 composite for the same calcination temperature [64].…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…(right) and opposite trend for 5 gr of TiO2 in ZnO/TiO2 composite as can be seen in Figure 6. The best composite for photocatalyst is for low attenuating and propagating constant, means that the structure will easily suppressing recombination of the charge particle due to the higher strain between the atoms [52,54]. In this study shows 5 gr of TiO2 in ZnO/TiO2 composite high potentials compared than that of 2.5 gr TiO2 in ZnO/TiO2 composite for the same calcination temperature [64].…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…where D is the grain size (nm), 𝜖 is the strain, 𝜆 is the wavelength (nm), K is a constant (0.94), 𝜃 is the peak position, 𝛽 hkl is the peak width at half-maximum intensity, calculated by a method previously reported. [18,19,20] The values of 𝛽 hkl for BVO-(100), BVO-(010), and BVO-(001) are, respectively, 64.8," 61.2," and 86.4," as shown in Figure 3c. By potting 4sin𝜃, the average size of the grains and the strain can be estimated by the Y intercept extrapolation and the slope of the line…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For this reason, the Williamson–Hall method was employed to estimate the average crystallite size of all the samples. 32 , 33 The Williamson–Hall method takes into consideration the width of the diffraction peak as a function of the diffraction angle 2θ. It assumes that the broadening of XRD peaks originates from the small crystallite size and microstrain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%