2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-577x(02)00438-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray diffraction and dielectric study of Co1−xCdxFe2−xCrxO4 ferrite system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, tan δ for sample A (8 nm) is about 0⋅0325 at 300 K in the same frequency range. The dielectric loss is thus found to be an order of magnitude lower for the 8 nm particles compared to that of the bulk cobalt ferrite (Shitre et al 2002). The sample A (8 nm) can, therefore, be used for high frequency communication because of the low value of dielectric loss.…”
Section: 2bmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, tan δ for sample A (8 nm) is about 0⋅0325 at 300 K in the same frequency range. The dielectric loss is thus found to be an order of magnitude lower for the 8 nm particles compared to that of the bulk cobalt ferrite (Shitre et al 2002). The sample A (8 nm) can, therefore, be used for high frequency communication because of the low value of dielectric loss.…”
Section: 2bmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The plots between dielectric loss (tan δ) and frequency for samples A and B are shown in figure 11(b). Shitre et al (2002) observed that tan δ is around 0⋅4 at 300 K in the frequency range of 1 kHz for the bulk cobalt ferrite prepared by ceramic method. In the present study, tan δ for sample A (8 nm) is about 0⋅0325 at 300 K in the same frequency range.…”
Section: 2bmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The increase in the complex permittivity with the treatment temperature is due to the structural and morphologic changes observed. This behaviour occurs for other ferrites [23,24], where an increase in ε′ with the temperature of the heat treatment is observed. The crystallite size of the particles (Figure 3) influences the dielectric response, that is, the increase in the crystallite size, which is maximum for the samples treated at 1050, 1100, 1150 and 1200°C, leads to an increase in the dielectric constant.…”
Section: Electrical and Dielectric Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It may be attributed to the interfacial polarizations predicted by Maxwell-Wagner model [10][11][12]. So the decrease in dielectric constant is due to inability of the electron exchanges between the two localized states (Fe +2 and Fe +3 ) to follow the external applied field beyond a certain frequency [13] and non respond of the dipoles due to space charge polarization at higher frequencies. At lower frequencies, the grain boundaries are more effective or contribution from the space charge polarization is high.…”
Section: Micro Structural Properties:-mentioning
confidence: 99%