1978
DOI: 10.1107/s0567739478001321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray diffraction from disordered cylindrical lattices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These distortions together suggest the stereochemistry of the CuN4N' chromophore of (I) is best described as trigonally distorted square-based pyramidal, rather than distorted trigonal bipyramidal (Harrison et al, 1981). There are no unusual bond lengths or bond angles in the coordination of the dpyam ligands (Ray & Hathaway, 1978). The individual pyridine rings of the coordinated dpyam ligands are reasonably planar (Ray & Hathaway, 1978), with r.m.s, deviations < 0.025 A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These distortions together suggest the stereochemistry of the CuN4N' chromophore of (I) is best described as trigonally distorted square-based pyramidal, rather than distorted trigonal bipyramidal (Harrison et al, 1981). There are no unusual bond lengths or bond angles in the coordination of the dpyam ligands (Ray & Hathaway, 1978). The individual pyridine rings of the coordinated dpyam ligands are reasonably planar (Ray & Hathaway, 1978), with r.m.s, deviations < 0.025 A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Wilson's approach to the case of curved crystallites can be extended and intensity expressions for the above cases readily worked out. However, it was considered necessary to derive a general expression for the diffracted intensities from disordered curved crystallites with layer shift in order to discuss the effect on the intensity as the shift changes gradually.The present calculation is based on the same model of a disordered curved crystallite and all the symbols carry the same meaning as described in the previous work (Ray, De & Bhattacherjee, 1978;De, Ray & Bhattacherjee, 1979). Here, also, R m and W m are taken to be the probabilities of the ruth layer being in the right and wrong places, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substitution of different values of K in (2) leads to the intensity expressions for different cases of layer shift. For K = 2 and 3, it reduces to equation (2) of Ray, De & Bhattacherjee (1978) and equation (2) of De, Ray & Bhattacherjee (1979) corresponding to the ~0/2 and tp/3 shifts, respectively. Based on this general expression, numerical computations have been carried out for intensities with different values of K corresponding to different values of unit angular shifts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations