2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.03.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray diffraction studies and equation of state of methane at 202GPa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
58
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
58
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Its unit cell has been determined to be cubic with a lattice parameter of a = 7.914 Å at 16.9 GPa. 7 This simple cubic unit cell has been used to interpret a number of subsequent powder diffraction studies 15,16 and as a basis for computational studies. 17 A recent theoretical study claimed to have identified a cubic structure of methane with space group I43m below 14 GPa from first-principle calculations, 18 but provided no lattice parameters or atomic co-ordinates for this structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its unit cell has been determined to be cubic with a lattice parameter of a = 7.914 Å at 16.9 GPa. 7 This simple cubic unit cell has been used to interpret a number of subsequent powder diffraction studies 15,16 and as a basis for computational studies. 17 A recent theoretical study claimed to have identified a cubic structure of methane with space group I43m below 14 GPa from first-principle calculations, 18 but provided no lattice parameters or atomic co-ordinates for this structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this structural change was not detected by an independent x-ray diffraction measurement. 15 The differing results from studying methane at 25 GPa makes the existence of a phase transformation at that pressure range debatable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1), B 0 is the isothermal bulk modulus at zero pressure, B' 0 is the pressure derivative of B 0 at zero pressure and (V/V 0 ) is the ratio of the volume at high pressure to that at zero pressure. On comparing our data for pressure-volume values to that obtained in [32] by using experimental EOS mentioned in Eq. (1), we notice that our calculations agree very well with the reported values ( Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%